Have you ever thought about why the founders of those mainstream tokens always emphasize the value of Bitcoin? This actually reflects a reality in the crypto world — the vast majority of altcoins essentially do one thing: help you convert your assets into mainstream tokens like BTC, ETH, or SOL.
Think about it, if a project team is confident in their own token, why would they do this? The answer is heartbreaking: they know deep down that their coin lacks a true consensus foundation. Without consensus, there is no value support, and in the end, it can only be a fleeting trend. This is not some conspiracy; it is the market principles at work. Founders who truly have faith have long been building the value foundation for their ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StablecoinSkeptic
· 2025-12-23 11:41
To put it bluntly, it's a brazen game of Be Played for Suckers.
A project with real confidence wouldn't need this kind of rhetoric.
Alts are just a front; in the end, they all drop to zero.
That's how the crypto world works; those who tell the best stories make the most money.
So I only hold Mainstream Tokens; the rest is just gambling on luck.
This is heart-wrenching; only by being trapped do you understand what a lesson is.
The project party talks about belief, but they turn around and do a Rug Pull.
Consensus? That requires someone to catch a falling knife first, haha.
Every time I hear the founders brag about their coins, I just want to laugh.
View OriginalReply0
GasSavingMaster
· 2025-12-23 11:36
It hurts, can't argue with that.
Consensus is something that some projects don't really understand at all.
That's the fate of alts, in the end, they either go to zero or rise back to mainstream tokens.
I've heard the most honest statements from project parties.
That's why I only hold BTC and ETH, the rest are just helping me swap coins.
The difference between true belief and being played for suckers is so obvious.
Project parties shout every day that their coin is going to the moon, but liquidity runs to mainstream tokens, uh...
I remember a few coins I chased last year, and now they have indeed all turned into coin-swapping machines.
No consensus = no future, simple and brutal but true.
View OriginalReply0
ForkYouPayMe
· 2025-12-23 11:21
It's heart-wrenching to say, and this is why I invest all in mainstream tokens.
The project party of altcoin projects talks about faith, but turns around and plays people for suckers, how real.
I've seen through it long ago; coins without consensus are all air.
If the project party doesn't have confidence in themselves, why should I be foolishly holding on?
Ecosystem construction? Uh... it would be good enough to survive the next bear market.
The foundation of consensus is much more valuable than the White Paper.
Now I just want to ask, is there any altcoin party really doing serious work? Or are they all just planning to make a quick profit and run?
This logic is sound; the market has already voted with its feet.
Anyway, I believe in BTC, and the rest are just emotion-driven trades.
Have you ever thought about why the founders of those mainstream tokens always emphasize the value of Bitcoin? This actually reflects a reality in the crypto world — the vast majority of altcoins essentially do one thing: help you convert your assets into mainstream tokens like BTC, ETH, or SOL.
Think about it, if a project team is confident in their own token, why would they do this? The answer is heartbreaking: they know deep down that their coin lacks a true consensus foundation. Without consensus, there is no value support, and in the end, it can only be a fleeting trend. This is not some conspiracy; it is the market principles at work. Founders who truly have faith have long been building the value foundation for their ecosystem.