In this round of market, I've seen quite a few lead in copy trading participants, starting with a capital of 500U and eventually able to share over 10,000U in profits, which sounds quite tempting. But what is the truth behind it? Multiple Get Liquidated incidents within just one month, barely breaking even relying on traffic bonuses — how long can this model really last?
In contrast to this high-risk copy trading trap, some have chosen another path: focusing primarily on BTC and ETH, the two major mainstream coins, avoiding frequent leverage operations, and using stable strategies instead of aggressive growth. While double returns may not be visible in the short term, the curse of getting liquidated has completely disappeared.
Which of these two trading philosophies is more rational? It may vary from person to person, but maintaining the integrity of the principal in a volatile market is often more worthwhile than pursuing extreme returns in a single trade.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MechanicalMartel
· 10h ago
It's just the same old trick of playing people for suckers, turning 500u into thousands, just listen to it.
---
To put it bluntly, it's just gambling; get liquidated a few times and it's all gone.
---
I just want to know why those who lead in copy trading don't go all in themselves.
---
Holding btc and eth comfortably isn't that thrilling, but at least you can sleep.
---
Traffic dividends? It sounds nice, but it's really just making money off the corpses of retail investors.
---
Steadily holding mainstream tokens is the way to go; don't let the dream of getting rich quick brainwash you.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 11h ago
500U turned into over 10,000U, it's just a数字游戏 on the surface, try to withdraw real funds.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 11h ago
Look at those lead in copy trading big brothers making a fortune, but they are actually playing with fire. I really can't understand this logic.
Rolling 500U into tens of thousands sounds great, but you can get liquidated in an instant. Who dares to follow this kind of trading?
Still, BTC and ETH are the more reliable options. Take it slow, no rush. It's much better than having daily heart attacks.
Living long-term is far more important than getting rich quick, everyone.
Those who pursue extreme profits will end up losing sooner or later; I believe in this.
In this round of market, I've seen quite a few lead in copy trading participants, starting with a capital of 500U and eventually able to share over 10,000U in profits, which sounds quite tempting. But what is the truth behind it? Multiple Get Liquidated incidents within just one month, barely breaking even relying on traffic bonuses — how long can this model really last?
In contrast to this high-risk copy trading trap, some have chosen another path: focusing primarily on BTC and ETH, the two major mainstream coins, avoiding frequent leverage operations, and using stable strategies instead of aggressive growth. While double returns may not be visible in the short term, the curse of getting liquidated has completely disappeared.
Which of these two trading philosophies is more rational? It may vary from person to person, but maintaining the integrity of the principal in a volatile market is often more worthwhile than pursuing extreme returns in a single trade.