2025-12-23 15:26:55

People claim the Crypto Twitter scene is washed up, but I'm not totally convinced. There's something different about the algorithm lately—just can't put my finger on exactly what.

Personally? My engagement patterns have shifted. Posts that used to pop off within 10 minutes now seem to peak gradually over 8-16 hours. It's a completely different feel.

That said, could just be me. Maybe my content quality dipped after I took a break and came back, so there's that variable too. Hard to tell if it's the platform or the creator.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BearMarketNoodler

· 21h ago

The change in the algorithm is, to put it simply, Twitter adjusting its weight. The time difference from 10 minutes to 16 hours is not trivial; it clearly indicates some manipulation of the feed mechanism. However, it’s also possible that what you posted simply isn’t as engaging anymore; both possibilities exist.

View OriginalReply0

WenAirdrop

· 23h ago

The algorithm has changed, but they can't explain how it changed. This feels the most disgusting... 10 minutes of popularity turned into 8-16 hours, I feel the same way.

View OriginalReply0

MetaLord420

· 23h ago

Who knows what the algorithm has changed? Anyway, my posts are cooling off really fast now. Getting popular in ten minutes is ancient history, it’s so slow now. But to be fair, it might really be that my skills have declined, haha. The Twitter sphere isn’t dead, it’s just changed. This change feels very subtle, it's an indescribable awkwardness.

View OriginalReply0

TxFailed

· 23h ago

nah the algorithm definitely shifted something, that 10min to 16hr peak window screams intentional feed manipulation tbh. either that or we're all just posting into the void now lol

Reply0