Franklin Templeton's XRP Spot ETF holdings have just surpassed 100 million coins. What does this number mean? In the long run, once a coin is approved through the ETF, it is indeed very difficult to drop to zero - institutional backing equates to providing it with fundamental credit.
But there is a detail that is easy to overlook: not all ETFs are created equal. The amount of funds from large institutions and small institutions is simply not on the same level.
The list of coins that have now been approved for ETF is not short - XRP, SOL, LTC, HBAR, LINK, and DOGE are all included. However, the only two that are actually held by multiple large institutions are SOL and XRP. What does this indicate? The investment logic of institutions is very clear - they choose stable options from the top ten mainstream coins by market capitalization. Although risk appetite has increased somewhat, they are essentially still pursuing certainty rather than betting on emerging opportunities.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SmartContractWorker
· 20h ago
100 million XRP acquired, Fidelity has really played this well. Both SOL and XRP are favored by big institutions, indicating that true smart money prioritizes stability, rather than engaging in the gimmicks of small coins.
View OriginalReply0
Web3ExplorerLin
· 20h ago
hypothesis: when institutions move 100m xrp, they're essentially building bridges across the old and new financial paradigms... but here's the thing nobody talks about—the oracle networks determining which assets "deserve" that institutional backing are kinda just recreating the gatekeeping systems we were supposed to escape, ngl
Franklin Templeton's XRP Spot ETF holdings have just surpassed 100 million coins. What does this number mean? In the long run, once a coin is approved through the ETF, it is indeed very difficult to drop to zero - institutional backing equates to providing it with fundamental credit.
But there is a detail that is easy to overlook: not all ETFs are created equal. The amount of funds from large institutions and small institutions is simply not on the same level.
The list of coins that have now been approved for ETF is not short - XRP, SOL, LTC, HBAR, LINK, and DOGE are all included. However, the only two that are actually held by multiple large institutions are SOL and XRP. What does this indicate? The investment logic of institutions is very clear - they choose stable options from the top ten mainstream coins by market capitalization. Although risk appetite has increased somewhat, they are essentially still pursuing certainty rather than betting on emerging opportunities.