In this round of internal conflict regarding AAVE, liquidation risks and leverage operations are intertwined. To be frank, the likelihood of the DAO failing and facing significant dumping is the highest - this is a personal judgment. Historical experience tells us that retail investors find it difficult to outsmart structural players such as market makers and exchanges.



You can see the market reaction. The odds of the proposal passing have dropped from the previous high of 60-70% to the current range of 5-25%. What does this decline indicate? Community confidence is rapidly eroding. What is driving this? Everyone knows in their hearts.
AAVE-3.44%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DaisyUnicornvip
· 5h ago
The retail investor's eternal nightmare... With the odds falling, even the little flowers in the garden have wilted.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzlervip
· 8h ago
Retail investors are always the ones getting played for suckers, I've long seen through it. AAVE is likely going to cool off this time.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearchervip
· 8h ago
From the data performance perspective, this 60% fall to 25% odds curve essentially reflects the vulnerability of Token Weighted Voting in a high-leverage environment. According to the governance mechanism design in the White Paper, this structural failure was already foreshadowed. Can retail investors win? Laughable. Citing Vitalik's viewpoint, as long as the incentive incompatibility problem is not solved, the game equilibrium is destined to have multiple solutions that favor Large Investors. It is worth noting that this round of internal conflict in AAVE is actually the inevitable outcome from the perspective of Token economics. Mixing liquidation and leverage? This is a typical debt spiral. Just looking at on-chain data can predict the outcome—don't talk about community confidence; that's just a superficial phenomenon. If this DAO truly fails with a large sell-off, it can only indicate one problem: your proposal mechanism cannot prevent "shark pools" at all; it should have been changed long ago.
View OriginalReply0
ConfusedWhalevip
· 8h ago
Here we go again, this trap. Why are retail investors so unfortunate, always being played for suckers.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)