#比特币流动性 Looking at a set of BTC data, I want to discuss the changes in the cost basis of short-term holders.
As of recently, retail-dominated short-term holders' cost basis is stuck at the 101,538 price level. Since falling below this level at the end of October, $BTC has been hovering below this line for nearly two months. Interestingly, similar situations have occurred in the past—after breaking below at the end of February, it held for 57 days; after breaking below in early August last year, it held for 50 days; and before that, in mid-August 2023, it held for 60 days. It seems that this 56-day performance might be approaching a cycle point?
Can it rebound? It’s definitely possible. Based on current price behavior, the market is working on building a bottom. Once the bottom is formed, the price will naturally move toward the cost basis, or even break through it. Moreover, as time passes, the cost basis of retail investors will also move downward, likely to around 100,000. So even if there is a rebound later, the pressure at the 100,000 level will probably be quite significant.
But this time might be different. The previous three adjustments all occurred during a bull market, with completely different market backgrounds. Now? Most on-chain data are flashing signals of a bear market. My feeling is that even if the price rises above the cost basis, it might not hold. The rebound could easily break down again and continue downward.
So the key is not whether it can rebound, but whether it can stabilize after rebounding. That’s the real test.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MidnightMEVeater
· 12-26 15:26
It's that "historical cycle theory" again—when retail investors' cost line falls below 56 days, a rebound is expected? I think, this time, it's really different—when bearish signals flicker, the rebound is a liquidity trap, and the chives rush in only to be sandwiched.
View OriginalReply0
RamenStacker
· 12-24 16:28
56 days are almost here. This time, the breakdown feels really different, and on-chain data has gone dark.
View OriginalReply0
PrivacyMaximalist
· 12-24 09:09
Starting to talk about the cost line again. Honestly, looking at this data is a bit troublesome; I've heard too many times about bottom construction.
I agree with the view that the rebound can't hold, as the bear market signals are so obvious.
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckbox
· 12-24 09:08
It's the same cost line analysis again. I'm already tired of the point at 101538. It's about time to see the real situation, right?
View OriginalReply0
ProxyCollector
· 12-24 09:02
The 56-day cycle theory sounds a bit like gambler's mentality. Can historical cycles really be replicated?
View OriginalReply0
WalletManager
· 12-24 08:59
101538 this number is firmly stuck, retail investors' cost basis is like a solid psychological defense line. But look, this time is really different, on-chain data tells an undeniable story, and bear market signals are flashing nonstop. Rebound? Maybe, but the real test is whether it can hold. The key level at 100,000 will reveal who is swimming naked.
#比特币流动性 Looking at a set of BTC data, I want to discuss the changes in the cost basis of short-term holders.
As of recently, retail-dominated short-term holders' cost basis is stuck at the 101,538 price level. Since falling below this level at the end of October, $BTC has been hovering below this line for nearly two months. Interestingly, similar situations have occurred in the past—after breaking below at the end of February, it held for 57 days; after breaking below in early August last year, it held for 50 days; and before that, in mid-August 2023, it held for 60 days. It seems that this 56-day performance might be approaching a cycle point?
Can it rebound? It’s definitely possible. Based on current price behavior, the market is working on building a bottom. Once the bottom is formed, the price will naturally move toward the cost basis, or even break through it. Moreover, as time passes, the cost basis of retail investors will also move downward, likely to around 100,000. So even if there is a rebound later, the pressure at the 100,000 level will probably be quite significant.
But this time might be different. The previous three adjustments all occurred during a bull market, with completely different market backgrounds. Now? Most on-chain data are flashing signals of a bear market. My feeling is that even if the price rises above the cost basis, it might not hold. The rebound could easily break down again and continue downward.
So the key is not whether it can rebound, but whether it can stabilize after rebounding. That’s the real test.