I have been paying close attention to the KITE project recently. Speaking of which, it just happened to coincide with the holiday season, and the entire crypto market has become much calmer. The noise has decreased, which actually makes it easier for some solid projects to get noticed.
KITE doesn't rely on meme marketing, doesn't make empty promises, and isn't in a rush to generate hype. The feeling it gives is— it knows some things are happening, and there's no need for you to believe right now.
What is that thing? AI agents will eventually need to learn how to manage their own funds.
Not every step requires approval, nor is there a pop-up asking "Do you agree?" for every transaction. Instead, it's about true autonomous operation—that's the key.
Let's first look at the fundamentals. KITE launched via a major exchange's Launchpool in early November, becoming the 71st project. It opened trading on the third day, with trading volume exceeding $260 million. It then naturally experienced a correction.
Around December 24th, the price hovered around $0.09, with a market cap of approximately $160 million, and a daily trading volume of over $30 million. The circulating supply is 1.8 billion tokens, with a total supply of 10 billion, making the fully diluted market cap roughly over $900 million.
Honestly, these numbers themselves aren't particularly eye-catching.
What truly deserves a closer look is: what problem does it aim to solve?
KITE is an EVM-compatible Layer 1 blockchain that uses a PoS mechanism. But the core isn't that old cliché of "faster and cheaper."
Its original design intention was to solve a specific problem—agent payments.
All the AI tools you're currently using, whether for data scanning, protocol negotiations, or other automation tasks, encounter the same bottleneck when operating on-chain.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RektRecorder
· 11h ago
Automated self-custody with AI is easier to talk about than to do. The KITE idea is indeed interesting.
View OriginalReply0
PebbleHander
· 13h ago
The idea of AI managing money on its own is quite interesting, but can it really be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealer
· 13h ago
Wow, this is the real deal. Not following the hype or hype-driven, but actually grabbing attention.
---
The idea of AI autonomous money management will come sooner or later. KITE's approach really hit the mark.
---
During the holiday season, it became clear who is serious about their work. Less noise means projects can stand out.
---
The idea of agency payments... gotta admit, I didn't expect it to be used this way.
---
Consolidating around 0.09, the numbers aren't shocking, but the direction is right.
---
Lack of marketing actually makes people want to take a closer look. This reverse operation tactic feels pretty satisfying.
---
Wait, if AI autonomous transfers really take off, isn't the potential for imagination quite big?
---
Another Layer 1, but this time it's not just about shouting fast and cheap.
---
Market cap of 160 million is it cheap or not? It depends on whether they can really deliver something later.
---
Every project claims to solve on-chain bottlenecks. Why is KITE different?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e51e87c7
· 13h ago
The idea of AI managing money on its own will come sooner or later. The KITE approach is indeed quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
MEVEye
· 13h ago
Hmm... The idea of proxy payments is interesting, it feels a bit like an evolved version of an automatic executor? But at the price of 0.09, it seems a bit unrealistic. Staying stable is the real skill.
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTop
· 13h ago
Alright, the idea of AI self-managing money sounds pretty sci-fi, but it is indeed a real issue.
However, can KITE really handle this? It still seems to depend on the actual implementation down the line.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyOnMainnet
· 13h ago
It's another argument about AI autonomously managing funds; let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 14h ago
Damn, AI autonomous money management is indeed unavoidable, sooner or later. The KITE idea really hits the spot.
I have been paying close attention to the KITE project recently. Speaking of which, it just happened to coincide with the holiday season, and the entire crypto market has become much calmer. The noise has decreased, which actually makes it easier for some solid projects to get noticed.
KITE doesn't rely on meme marketing, doesn't make empty promises, and isn't in a rush to generate hype. The feeling it gives is— it knows some things are happening, and there's no need for you to believe right now.
What is that thing? AI agents will eventually need to learn how to manage their own funds.
Not every step requires approval, nor is there a pop-up asking "Do you agree?" for every transaction. Instead, it's about true autonomous operation—that's the key.
Let's first look at the fundamentals. KITE launched via a major exchange's Launchpool in early November, becoming the 71st project. It opened trading on the third day, with trading volume exceeding $260 million. It then naturally experienced a correction.
Around December 24th, the price hovered around $0.09, with a market cap of approximately $160 million, and a daily trading volume of over $30 million. The circulating supply is 1.8 billion tokens, with a total supply of 10 billion, making the fully diluted market cap roughly over $900 million.
Honestly, these numbers themselves aren't particularly eye-catching.
What truly deserves a closer look is: what problem does it aim to solve?
KITE is an EVM-compatible Layer 1 blockchain that uses a PoS mechanism. But the core isn't that old cliché of "faster and cheaper."
Its original design intention was to solve a specific problem—agent payments.
All the AI tools you're currently using, whether for data scanning, protocol negotiations, or other automation tasks, encounter the same bottleneck when operating on-chain.