2025-12-25 01:26:10

What if we measured crypto's total market capitalization against actual revenue instead? Makes you think about how traditional valuation metrics might reshape the way we look at this space.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DefiOldTrickster

· 4h ago

Haha, this is exactly what I always say—this circle is all air valuation. If we really calculated market cap based on revenue, how many projects would go straight to zero? I wouldn't even dare to calculate.

View OriginalReply0

GasGrillMaster

· 9h ago

To be honest, this idea is a bit naive... Most crypto projects don't have any real income at all. What are they comparing to traditional valuations? Isn't this just asking for trouble?

View OriginalReply0

CryptoFortuneTeller

· 22h ago

Can traditional valuation methods really be applied to the crypto space? This logic seems a bit problematic...

View OriginalReply0

FUD_Whisperer

· 22h ago

This logic is just as flawed when applied to Web2... The real issue is that there are very few projects in the crypto space with genuine cash flow. Stop pretending.

View OriginalReply0

DefiSecurityGuard

· 22h ago

ngl, revenue metrics would absolutely expose how many of these projects are just exit liquidity traps waiting to happen. DYOR before the rugpull indicators kick in.

Reply0

liquiditea_sipper

· 22h ago

This question hits the nail on the head... Most cryptocurrencies actually have no cash flow at all, so comparing them to traditional valuation methods becomes awkward.

View OriginalReply0

SlowLearnerWang