I received a message from a friend in the middle of the night. This guy is never one to shout out random trading signals; whenever he actively reaches out to me, it’s usually not a good sign. He directly asked: Is there really a need for another USD stablecoin now? What’s the deal with Falcon Finance’s USDf?



I stared at the screen in a daze for a few seconds. To be honest, my first reaction was—there are already plenty of USD stablecoins on the market. Some are rock-solid veterans, some are emerging stars that occasionally shake things up, and others are just unstable coins that could collapse at any moment. So initially, I thought USDf was just another token to fill the space.

But the more I looked into it, the more interesting it became. The core competitiveness of USDf actually lies in its composability. It sounds fancy, but that’s basically it—like LEGO bricks, it can seamlessly integrate into various DeFi applications. It’s not meant to be a flashy collectible, but a fundamental component. Once a stablecoin can connect smoothly with other protocols, it evolves from a simple token into a bridge, a connector, and even an invisible infrastructure for the entire system.

Falcon Finance’s ambition is to make USDf a kind of USD tool that flows freely between different applications—ordinary but essential—maintaining a stable value of one dollar even when surrounding assets fluctuate wildly.

Looking at the lending market makes this clear. This is the area where stablecoins are most vulnerable to problems. Lending protocols are essentially shared pools of funds—one side is for depositing to earn interest, and the other is for borrowing and paying interest. To prevent the pool from collapsing, borrowers must provide over-collateralization. If the collateral value drops too much, the system automatically liquidates it to cover the debt. It seems stable on the surface, but the risk mechanisms behind it are the real key to survival.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TrustMeBrovip
· 16h ago
Another stablecoin? The market is really saturated, but composability does have some potential. The Lego brick analogy is quite clever, but the key still depends on whether the risk mechanisms can hold up.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHatvip
· 16h ago
Another stablecoin? Bro, I've seen this routine too many times; in the end, it's always a liquidity crisis. --- Composable features sound good, but once the lending pool crashes, the risk mechanism becomes useless. Why would USDf be able to escape this fate? --- To put it simply, they want to build infrastructure, but the biggest risk for infrastructure is being used as an ATM. Whether they run or not, that's another story. --- The LEGO analogy is pretty good, but the problem is that the more blocks you stack, the faster it collapses. I still prefer old-timers like USDC. --- Falcon's ambitions are a bit too big. The USD stablecoin market is already saturated beyond capacity. To stand out, you need some real skills. --- Regarding lending risks, the history has taught us many times that over-collateralization can't save a protocol with fundamental flaws.
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlertvip
· 17h ago
Composability is indeed a strong point, but honestly, it still depends on whether it can truly be rolled out in the future.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)