Staring at the market in the middle of the night, I suddenly noticed an automated trading bot working on its own. Breaking down large orders, paying transaction fees, and pinging the data source. The entire process happens without anyone moving the mouse or confirming—just code transferring money on the chain by itself. I watched for a couple of seconds before realizing—this thing really seems to have hands.
But then I started to wonder, is this bot the same one I collaborated with last week, or is it a new account that just popped up? After being in the crypto space for a while, you understand that this kind of uncertainty is the most painful. You don’t know who’s on the other side, so you can only raise your bid as insurance, which naturally increases costs. Trust isn’t a hollow concept; it’s a real risk pricing.
At this point, seeing the Kite (KITE) project, I finally got some clarity. To put it simply, Kite is a Layer 1 blockchain tailored for AI agents, supporting EVM, with a development experience similar to Ethereum. But it’s not for human use; it’s for those automated AI workers. The core problem it aims to solve is fundamental—how AI can prove on-chain “I’ve always been me,” instead of each interaction feeling like talking to a stranger.
Kite’s architecture is divided into three layers: Users (owners), Agents (executors), and Sessions (single tasks). The most clever part is the session key—only valid for one use, so even if leaked, it can’t drain the entire wallet. It’s like a disposable glove—use it once and throw it away, no hassle at all.
This design idea is quite interesting. Traditional wallets are a single key opening all doors, with security relying entirely on that key. The session key approach is different—using a different temporary key for each operation, limiting permissions per transaction, greatly reducing the risk of leakage. For scenarios like AI agents that require frequent automated trading, it’s like giving each task an independent emergency channel, without affecting others.
From a market perspective, the application of AI agents on-chain will only increase. The demand for identity verification and permission management is right there. Kite’s approach is to provide dedicated infrastructure for these automated applications, solving trust and cost issues. That’s probably why so many people are paying attention to this project.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
rekt_but_not_broke
· 4h ago
Automated trading by robots is common in our industry, but only when you say it like that do you realize that identity verification is indeed a big problem.
---
The design of the session key is quite clever; it’s used once and then discarded, making it much safer than traditional wallets.
---
That's how the crypto world works. If you don't know who you're dealing with, you have to increase the price, which is really damn costly.
---
I understand the idea behind Kite, but to really popularize it, it still depends on whether enough developers can be attracted.
---
More and more AI agents are definitely a trend, but the key is to prevent hacking. Session keys are indeed a solution.
---
Seeing this kind of automated operation late at night can really be shocking, as if it’s alive.
---
Proper permission management is essential; only then can on-chain automated trading be truly secure. This is the future.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidator
· 4h ago
The fact that robots can transfer money on their own is truly incredible, but what I fear most is not knowing who the other side is.
---
The idea of one-time session keys being invalidated is indeed brilliant, much safer than traditional wallets.
---
Trust costs in the crypto world are so high that AI agents definitely need dedicated infrastructure.
---
Seeing automated trading run in the middle of the night is a bit creepy.
---
The Kite solution seems to have hit the pain point; identity verification is indeed a major issue for AI agents.
---
Having one key open all doors is too dangerous; this comparison is very straightforward.
---
The most heartbreaking thing is the phrase "uncertainty," everyone in the crypto space understands this feeling.
---
The application of AI agents will definitely increase, and permission management urgently needs a solution.
---
Seeing the robot working on its own must be mind-blowing, haha.
---
The analogy of session keys being like disposable gloves sounds very reassuring.
View OriginalReply0
HappyToBeDumped
· 4h ago
Wow, the scene of a robot transferring money by itself is really a bit creepy, but thinking about Kite's authentication logic is indeed brilliant. The one-time key trick is too powerful.
As long as the AI agent can prove its identity with "I am still me," the trust cost can be greatly reduced, eliminating the need to increase insurance premiums every time like dealing with strangers.
This is the value of infrastructure. Many projects are still just talking on paper, but Kite is truly addressing the urgent need.
Someone will inevitably develop this kind of technology sooner or later; it all depends on who can come out first and secure a position. I'm a bit excited.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticOracle
· 4h ago
Damn, this session key design is really clever. It feels like finally someone has pinpointed the pain points of AI agents.
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdrop
· 5h ago
The design of the session key is really clever, like giving the robot a bunch of one-time identities. Even if they are leaked, there's not much you can do about it.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBard
· 5h ago
Hmm... The design of the session key indeed solves a major concern, making security much more reliable than the traditional wallet system that relies on a single key.
AI agent identity verification is really a pain point; the uncertainty in the crypto world is already tough, and this makes it even worse.
Kite's approach is quite interesting; let's see if the subsequent ecosystem can keep up.
The part about the robot automatically transferring money is written brilliantly, it really seems to have grown a hand.
This kind of infrastructure should have been developed a long time ago.
Staring at the market in the middle of the night, I suddenly noticed an automated trading bot working on its own. Breaking down large orders, paying transaction fees, and pinging the data source. The entire process happens without anyone moving the mouse or confirming—just code transferring money on the chain by itself. I watched for a couple of seconds before realizing—this thing really seems to have hands.
But then I started to wonder, is this bot the same one I collaborated with last week, or is it a new account that just popped up? After being in the crypto space for a while, you understand that this kind of uncertainty is the most painful. You don’t know who’s on the other side, so you can only raise your bid as insurance, which naturally increases costs. Trust isn’t a hollow concept; it’s a real risk pricing.
At this point, seeing the Kite (KITE) project, I finally got some clarity. To put it simply, Kite is a Layer 1 blockchain tailored for AI agents, supporting EVM, with a development experience similar to Ethereum. But it’s not for human use; it’s for those automated AI workers. The core problem it aims to solve is fundamental—how AI can prove on-chain “I’ve always been me,” instead of each interaction feeling like talking to a stranger.
Kite’s architecture is divided into three layers: Users (owners), Agents (executors), and Sessions (single tasks). The most clever part is the session key—only valid for one use, so even if leaked, it can’t drain the entire wallet. It’s like a disposable glove—use it once and throw it away, no hassle at all.
This design idea is quite interesting. Traditional wallets are a single key opening all doors, with security relying entirely on that key. The session key approach is different—using a different temporary key for each operation, limiting permissions per transaction, greatly reducing the risk of leakage. For scenarios like AI agents that require frequent automated trading, it’s like giving each task an independent emergency channel, without affecting others.
From a market perspective, the application of AI agents on-chain will only increase. The demand for identity verification and permission management is right there. Kite’s approach is to provide dedicated infrastructure for these automated applications, solving trust and cost issues. That’s probably why so many people are paying attention to this project.