Recently, a wave of cunning on-chain transfer scams has emerged. The methods seem simple but are hard to defend against. Some users have posted urgent warnings on social platforms of major exchanges, revealing that a victim planned to transfer $50 million USD, but got caught during the "small test" phase.
The story goes like this: To be cautious, the user first transferred 0.01 tokens to the target address as a test. The transaction succeeded, the balance showed normal, and everything checked out. He relaxed, ready to transfer the $50 million USD.
But the problem lies here. The scammers have been monitoring on-chain activities, specifically looking for this "small test" trick. They played a clever move—using technology to generate a fake address that has the same first and last characters as the real address, then transferred a tiny amount of funds into the victim’s actual address.
This created an incoming transaction record in the victim’s wallet history. When he was about to make a large transfer, he habitually copied the address from the most recent transaction record. The issue is that most people only check the first and last few characters of the address, not the entire 42-character address.
As a result, he unintentionally copied the fake address, and the $50 million USD flowed directly into the scammer’s pocket.
The key point for prevention is: don’t be lazy. Always verify the full address for each transfer, or use your wallet’s address book feature to save frequently used addresses. Small tests are a good habit, but don’t let this habit become a vulnerability. On-chain transfers have no undo mechanism—one mistake and you could lose everything.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SleepTrader
· 9h ago
Damn, that move is genius, specifically targeting those "I'm just testing" guys. Losing 50 million like that is truly hardcore.
View OriginalReply0
MemecoinTrader
· 9h ago
ngl this is textbook sentiment manipulation disguised as "security awareness" — classic fear-mongering to consolidate exchange deposits lol. the real alpha? scammers basically running a *perfect* A/B test on user behavior patterns... kinda genius tbh
Reply0
ApeWithNoChain
· 9h ago
Damn, 50 million just disappeared like that? This technique is really top-notch, specifically setting traps in transaction records.
---
Once again, copying and pasting led to a failure. I need to remember this lesson.
---
No wonder I manually input the first few digits and the last few digits each time to double-check. This move was too ruthless.
---
Basically, human laziness is being precisely exploited. There's no regret pill on the blockchain, and that really hits hard.
---
Small test transactions were supposed to be safe, but they turned into bait. The logic is quite dark.
---
I just want to know how much computing power this scam team needs to generate such fake addresses. The technical level is not low.
---
Every time I see cases like this, I remind myself that no matter how urgent, I can't skip the verification step. Losing 50 million is too costly a lesson.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretDiary
· 9h ago
Damn, this technique is really clever, using small test transactions as bait... I need to quickly check the recent address records.
Recently, a wave of cunning on-chain transfer scams has emerged. The methods seem simple but are hard to defend against. Some users have posted urgent warnings on social platforms of major exchanges, revealing that a victim planned to transfer $50 million USD, but got caught during the "small test" phase.
The story goes like this: To be cautious, the user first transferred 0.01 tokens to the target address as a test. The transaction succeeded, the balance showed normal, and everything checked out. He relaxed, ready to transfer the $50 million USD.
But the problem lies here. The scammers have been monitoring on-chain activities, specifically looking for this "small test" trick. They played a clever move—using technology to generate a fake address that has the same first and last characters as the real address, then transferred a tiny amount of funds into the victim’s actual address.
This created an incoming transaction record in the victim’s wallet history. When he was about to make a large transfer, he habitually copied the address from the most recent transaction record. The issue is that most people only check the first and last few characters of the address, not the entire 42-character address.
As a result, he unintentionally copied the fake address, and the $50 million USD flowed directly into the scammer’s pocket.
The key point for prevention is: don’t be lazy. Always verify the full address for each transfer, or use your wallet’s address book feature to save frequently used addresses. Small tests are a good habit, but don’t let this habit become a vulnerability. On-chain transfers have no undo mechanism—one mistake and you could lose everything.