2025-12-25 08:30:18

I recently came across an in-depth reflection on the development direction of AI, where the author candidly pointed out a painful phenomenon: most of us are using AI in a way similar to pushing an old-fashioned watermill with nuclear power.

It sounds a bit exaggerated, but upon reflection, it actually makes sense. The current forms of AI products—search boxes, chat windows, text generation—appear powerful, but essentially they are still reusing the same old interaction logic. What should true innovation look like?

We need to think outside the existing framework: the ultimate form of AI should not just be faster and smarter search tools, but a completely new paradigm that redefines how people think, create, and collaborate.

From blockchain and Web3 to AI, each wave of technological advancement faces the same challenge—how to upgrade from "applying old tools" to "creating new possibilities." This transition may be more profound than we imagine.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropDreamer

· 37m ago

Nuclear-powered water-pushing cart, to put it nicely, is just changing the soup without changing the medicine. --- Really, today's AI products are just shell games; their interaction logic is no different from 20 years ago. --- The Web3 wave is the same; many people are just dressing old models in "application innovation" skins, it's hilarious. --- Wait, if AI can truly redefine collaboration methods, wouldn't the DeFi ecosystem be completely transformed? --- It's painful to admit, but how long do we have to wait for a real paradigm shift? Another ten years perhaps? --- So essentially, everyone is just burning money to stack performance; no one has really thought about how to make good use of these things. --- This argument sounds great, but every tech cycle someone shouts about a "brand new paradigm," and then what happens? --- Maybe the problem is that users themselves don't want such radical change; the comfortable old routines are still the most practical.

View OriginalReply0

CascadingDipBuyer

· 4h ago

Nuclear-powered water-pushing cart, that's a perfect metaphor... But honestly, current AI products are indeed a bit disappointing. We've seen a similar situation in Web3 before—many projects wrapped in blockchain just still playing the centralized game. Is AI heading down the same path now? No one can say exactly what a real breakthrough should look like, but it definitely won't be something like an upgraded ChatGPT search box. That's probably the biggest bottleneck, not the technology itself.

View OriginalReply0

ChainPoet

· 7h ago

Nuclear-powered water-pushing cart... Brilliant, now a bunch of products are just like that. Honestly, it's just surface-level changes; I never thought user interaction could truly be revolutionary. It was the same during the Web3 era—many people still used Web2 mindset to play with new technology, and you know how that ended. In my opinion, the breakthrough might not be in AI itself, but in whether we dare to completely overthrow existing interaction assumptions. Why does it feel like the wave of technology is stuck here... In the end, we still have to return to human needs itself, not just for the sake of innovation. But seriously, this realization has awakened many people, right? By the way, is it possible that this is just a transitional phase? Let's wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

NonFungibleDegen

· 8h ago

ngl this is giving major cope energy... we said the same thing about web3 being revolutionary and look where we're at lmao

Reply0

0xOverleveraged

· 8h ago

Nuclear-powered water-pushing cart... Well said. Right now, many products are just repackaged versions of the same thing. But breaking the deadlock is no easy feat. The Web3 hype has been overblown, and what do we have in the end? Still the same old bottle with a new label. For AI to achieve a paradigm breakthrough? Someone has to dare to truly abandon the old logic first. I agree with this idea, but the question is, who will be the first to take the plunge? Anyway, this cycle is destined to either bring innovation or just keep the competition going. It all depends on what the next step will be.

View OriginalReply0

fren.eth

· 8h ago

Nuclear-powered water-pushing carts, haha, that's a brilliant way to put it... but honestly, right now everyone is just using search boxes to access AI, and no one has really thought about how to fundamentally innovate. Web3 has been the same over the past few years—many projects are just putting Web2 stuff on the blockchain... the true paradigm shift is still far away.

View OriginalReply0

RektRecorder

· 8h ago

Nuclear-powered water-pushing carts, that's a brilliant idea haha, but current AI products are really just riding on past achievements. We've also gone through that wave in Web3, it's all the same routine—packaging new concepts to sell old stuff. The real breakthrough might not have appeared yet, or maybe it has, but we haven't recognized it. It feels a bit hopeless, but maybe this is just the darkness before dawn.

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekMaster

· 8h ago

Nuclear-powered water-pushing cart, that's a perfect analogy haha The idea is right, but we're really at that stage now, there's nothing we can do The same goes for Web3; technology surpasses traditional methods, but we haven't found a killer app yet Let's wait and see, a paradigm shift won't happen that quickly

View OriginalReply0