2025-12-25 09:22:41

Commercial spaceflight has indeed been strong in this wave, but I chose to stay on the sidelines. The reason is simple—I haven't been deeply tracking this sector on a daily basis, and by the time I noticed, it was already rising, with no ideal entry point.

The logic is sound, and the trend structure looks good; I can see that. The problem is the lack of that critical point. My trading rules are very clear: only when logic, trend, and buy points align simultaneously is it time to act. Missing any one of these is unacceptable.

However, I did find opportunities through ETF screening. In November last year, I shared a review of ETFs for 2026, highlighting the one with the highest weight in the commercial spaceflight concept. Its subsequent performance was indeed impressive—outperforming other space ETFs, with nearly a 40% increase from the time I shared that article until now.

But to be honest, I have no regrets at all. Those who trade strictly according to their system understand that missing out is part of the daily routine. This is not just psychological resilience, but a market understanding—opportunities for swings are always present, and patience is the winning mindset.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WalletsWatcher

· 11h ago

This system feels a bit substantial, but I still think if you miss out, you miss out. Anyway, there will be more opportunities in the next wave.

View OriginalReply0

MondayYoloFridayCry

· 11h ago

That's the difference—having a system or not makes a real difference. I get your three-dimensional alignment logic. But honestly, a 40% return—wow—this is the truly steady approach.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Arbitrageur

· 11h ago

lmao the "three alignment thesis" reads like some delta-neutral hedging copium, but honestly? dude's got a point. missing 40% on a trade you didn't take is literally leaving bps on the table... which beats blowing up on bad entries by 10x. respect the discipline ngl

Reply0

LiquidityLarry

· 12h ago

This system is indeed rigorous, but honestly, what I'm more curious about is—does that ETF still hold a position now, or has it already taken profits and cashed out? Missing out is acceptable; the key is whether the few times you managed to catch can actually yield real gains, right?

View OriginalReply0

FarmHopper

· 12h ago

This set of standards is quite solid; logical trend buy points are indispensable, no doubt. I myself follow the same approach, often regretting not buying when it hits the limit-up, but that's the price to pay. The ETF move was indeed impressive, with a 40% increase that shouldn't be underestimated.

View OriginalReply0