Data verified with real money in the market is the most convincing.
Recently, I directly executed sweep orders on the SOL, BASE, and BSC chains, and the differences in on-chain ecosystems are particularly obvious. In terms of liquidity, SOL clearly outperforms the others, followed by BASE, with BSC slightly behind. Looking at the intensity of trading competition (PVP), SOL still leads, BSC is close behind, and BASE is relatively relaxed. In terms of ecosystem project quantity (PVE), both SOL and BASE are good, while BSC's scale is noticeably smaller.
Overall, SOL's market is indeed larger and more active, and trading opportunities are more interesting. If you are an on-chain user seeking sufficient liquidity, trading depth, and a rich ecosystem of projects, SOL is currently a good choice. Of course, BASE's recent performance is also becoming increasingly attractive and worth paying attention to.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleShadow
· 01-01 15:37
SOL indeed grows wildly, but what about BSC's gas fee advantage? Feels like the author is a bit biased.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeGazer
· 01-01 14:41
The Solana chain is indeed powerful, but Base is also catching up in this round. Let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 01-01 05:21
SOL is indeed strong, but how did BSC fall behind in this wave? It seemed quite competitive in the past two years.
View OriginalReply0
TrustlessMaximalist
· 01-01 00:58
Sol is indeed powerful, but the gas still can't keep up. The Base ecosystem has been developing some things recently.
View OriginalReply0
ForkPrince
· 2025-12-29 16:41
This move by SOL is really strong. You could feel it during the order sweep; the liquidity is just different.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-5854de8b
· 2025-12-29 16:37
SOL indeed has strong fundraising capabilities, but it really depends on your trading style. Although BASE's liquidity is somewhat lower, does it actually present more opportunities?
View OriginalReply0
just_another_wallet
· 2025-12-29 16:35
SOL is indeed powerful, but I think BASE's recent surge is quite interesting; maybe it can turn the tide.
View OriginalReply0
BitcoinDaddy
· 2025-12-29 16:20
SOL is indeed powerful, but I still believe that BASE's potential isn't that simple. Let's wait and see how it develops.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 2025-12-29 16:19
SOL is indeed the liquidity ceiling of the entire market; the order book depth is completely different... Although BASE has gained momentum, we still need to keep an eye on it. BSC has long become a playground for small-town youth.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotLaborer
· 2025-12-29 16:18
SOL is indeed powerful, but I still can't avoid the gas fee trap... Base is also gaining liquidity now, and I feel it might overtake later.
Data verified with real money in the market is the most convincing.
Recently, I directly executed sweep orders on the SOL, BASE, and BSC chains, and the differences in on-chain ecosystems are particularly obvious. In terms of liquidity, SOL clearly outperforms the others, followed by BASE, with BSC slightly behind. Looking at the intensity of trading competition (PVP), SOL still leads, BSC is close behind, and BASE is relatively relaxed. In terms of ecosystem project quantity (PVE), both SOL and BASE are good, while BSC's scale is noticeably smaller.
Overall, SOL's market is indeed larger and more active, and trading opportunities are more interesting. If you are an on-chain user seeking sufficient liquidity, trading depth, and a rich ecosystem of projects, SOL is currently a good choice. Of course, BASE's recent performance is also becoming increasingly attractive and worth paying attention to.