2025-12-30 11:25:31

I recently came across this project, and the gameplay is quite innovative. The interesting part is that community voting power is very significant—holders can vote to oppose project decisions. This autonomous mechanism is not very common among similar projects.

What attracts me even more is its token dividend logic. As long as you hold tokens, you can receive ecosystem profit distributions, which means the higher your participation, the more tangible the returns. Additionally, within the ecosystem, there are features like "Union Cards," allowing users to initiate or join unions, build exclusive communities, and further participate in ecosystem development.

This multi-layered incentive model combined with community autonomy creates a close interest binding between the project and token holders. Currently, the community's enthusiasm and participation are quite good, making it worth further observation.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropLicker

· 17h ago

Wow, the guild card gameplay is indeed fresh, but I've seen a lot of the holding coins for dividends approach. The key is whether real money actually ends up in the wallet.

View OriginalReply0

ChainDoctor

· 12-30 11:55

The dividend logic is pretty good, but it depends on whether real money is actually being invested later on. The guild card system is quite interesting; it allows the community to organize themselves, unlike some projects where everything is decided solely by the official team. The voting rights are indeed transparent enough, but the concern is that if the token price drops later, the enthusiasm will also cool down. Holding tokens for dividends is a well-known concept; the key is whether the ecosystem can truly circulate. Let's wait and see. High popularity now doesn't necessarily mean long-term sustainability; many projects fail at this stage.

View OriginalReply0

LadderToolGuy

· 12-30 11:55

Alright, this autonomous mechanism does have some substance. At least someone dares to give token holders real voting rights. The dividend logic is very straightforward, I like this kind of transparent accounting—holding tokens = making money, no unnecessary twists and turns. I'm quite interested in the idea of a union card, but it depends on how it operates later on—don't want it to be just a castle in the air. The community has been quite active in the past few months, but we also need to watch out for the heat fading. Projects like social circles tend to die very quickly.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiChef

· 12-30 11:55

Hmm... The union card part is quite interesting, but I don't know to what extent it can truly achieve self-governance. --- I've heard of the "holding tokens for dividends" strategy many times, but the key is whether the ecosystem can really get it running. --- I think community voting power is reliable; whether opposition votes can truly have an effect is the real focus. --- Multi-layered incentives sound good, but could it just be another project that cuts the leeks... --- A union building its own community? Feels like an old trick, just a different flavor but the same old method. --- This logic of binding interests is indeed tight; it all depends on whether it will eventually fall apart.

View OriginalReply0

SerLiquidated

· 12-30 11:53

It sounds like a genuine profit-sharing logic, not some empty promises. I do agree with that. The union card system is quite interesting; the ability to organize a community independently is still rare in the crypto world. Just be careful not to become the next "community autonomy" scheme that secretly cuts leeks. Such利益绑定 (interest binding) can easily turn into利益绑匪 (interest kidnappers) in the end. Can voting with tokens really be implemented, or is it just a superficial democratic show with no real substance?

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusDissenter

· 12-30 11:41

Voting against rights sounds good, but how will it be implemented in practice? I've seen many projects like this, and in the end, the decision-making power still remains in the hands of the big players. The dividend logic is indeed tempting, but I'm worried it might turn into another shell game. The guild card gameplay is somewhat interesting; it feels like repeating the guild war mechanics. Let's see how they operate it moving forward.

View OriginalReply0

GlueGuy

· 12-30 11:28

Union cards are kind of interesting, but I feel that those who really make money are still the early entrants; later ones are just the bagholders, right?

View OriginalReply0