#数字资产市场动态 $BTC has already formed quite a few low-level long protection orders near the 87,000 mark. The choice at this point is actually simple: if you're optimistic about the future, set your stop-loss protection and hold your position with confidence; if you're not sure, then take profits or reduce your position during the rebound. Don't overthink it—act when you should, hold when you need to, short-term trading is that straightforward.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LightningWallet
· 1h ago
Reaching 87,000 is indeed interesting, but the real test is still ahead.
View OriginalReply0
ForkLibertarian
· 19h ago
87000 this level is really a bit stuck, but we need to have a stance
---
Don't make it so complicated, it's just the gambler's mentality acting up
---
There's nothing wrong with that statement, the key is still your own risk tolerance
---
Stay or run, you've probably known the answer in your heart for a long time
---
I just want to know who can really cut losses properly, most people hold on until they collapse
---
Rebound and then run, I've played this routine before, and the result was that I ran too early
---
It's easy to say, but when it really comes to the moment, it's just emotional hijacking
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofster
· 2025-12-30 18:17
technically speaking, this "simple choice" framing is exactly where most traders get rekt. the order book doesn't care about your conviction, and that's the whole point—you need *proof* of edge, not feelings about "后市"
Reply0
PumpStrategist
· 2025-12-30 15:30
87000 this level of chip accumulation is indeed interesting, but the RSI has long been overbought, and now you're still calling for protective orders... You haven't even looked at the full chart, right?
---
Set your stop-loss and then dare to hold your position? That's typical rookie thinking. Rebound harvesting is the right way; don't be blinded by protective orders for low buys.
---
Going short-term directly? Haha, people who are so direct every time, now their graves are already three feet high.
---
If you ask me about this wave, 87000 already shows signs of excessive market sentiment. The market is not as simple as it seems.
---
The pattern has formed, but the volume hasn't kept up. It's a bit concerning, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
NftDeepBreather
· 2025-12-30 15:30
The 87,000 level is essentially the life and death line for the bulls. You need to think clearly whether you're betting on a rebound or a pullback. Don't bet on both sides; if you do, it's really time to reflect.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOrektGuy
· 2025-12-30 15:26
The 87,000 level is really interesting. With so many protective buy orders stacked, it feels like someone is planning a big move.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSnapHunter
· 2025-12-30 15:23
Many people are indeed watching the 87,000 level; you really need to think carefully about what type of trader you are.
View OriginalReply0
GasBankrupter
· 2025-12-30 15:12
The 87,000 level is really quite critical. I think it depends on how you handle your mental state.
It's easy to say, but when it comes to the critical moment, it's not easy to stay calm.
I've been using the rebound and harvest strategy for a long time, and I'm always just a little short.
I feel like this round might break through directly, which is quite uncertain.
Stop-loss and such have already been set, it all depends on the mood of the coin daddy.
#数字资产市场动态 $BTC has already formed quite a few low-level long protection orders near the 87,000 mark. The choice at this point is actually simple: if you're optimistic about the future, set your stop-loss protection and hold your position with confidence; if you're not sure, then take profits or reduce your position during the rebound. Don't overthink it—act when you should, hold when you need to, short-term trading is that straightforward.