Next year, the Federal Reserve will change, but you might be mistaken.



Many people think the Chair has the final say, but in reality, the decision-making power of the Federal Reserve is quite dispersed. With 18 committee members sitting together, hawkish officials are making a strong comeback. Even if the new Chair has already been decided, the internal power struggle has just begun. This is not a one-person show.

Why is this so important to the crypto world? Because the interest rate path directly influences market expectations. Recent economic data seem to "possibly not support rate cuts," which means there are huge uncertainties about policy directions in 2026.

**Who might sit on the Chair?**

The market generally favors Haskett. But for him to truly take the position, he needs to gain support and recognition from other committee members. One person's ideas versus the consensus of 18 people—that's two different things.

**Powell's Choice**

Current Chair Powell will need to make a decision by May 2026—whether to stay on or step down completely. His four-year term is also coming to an end. This adds another variable.

**Don't underestimate regional Fed banks**

Even if the new Chair or other Board members change, the FOMC still has five other voting members from regional Fed banks each year. Who holds these five positions directly constrains the power of the Board. In other words, the new appointees by Trump cannot do whatever they want. This clearly balances some investors' previous concerns.

So the key question is: what will the power structure of the Federal Reserve look like in 2026? Which direction will interest rates go? These remain mysteries, but they will definitely influence the rhythm of the crypto market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MidnightTradervip
· 6h ago
Hasset's rise also requires 18 people to approve. This approach is similar to governance in the crypto circle—distributed power makes it easier to get stuck.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHuntervip
· 14h ago
Damn, I really didn't think through the voting of 18 people before. The weight of the 5 votes from the regional Federal Reserve was seriously underestimated, and that's the real arbitrage opportunity.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaservip
· 12-30 15:56
This guy really explained the complexity of the Federal Reserve thoroughly. The aspect of dispersed power is indeed easy to overlook.
View OriginalReply0
FarmToRichesvip
· 12-30 15:56
The decentralization of power has been seriously underestimated; one chairman simply cannot make the final decision.
View OriginalReply0
RooftopReservervip
· 12-30 15:55
Another complex power game, and in our crypto circle, we just have to go along with the fun.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOmonstervip
· 12-30 15:46
Really, the decentralization of power is much more complicated than I thought; it's not something that can be controlled entirely just by changing the chairman.
View OriginalReply0
pvt_key_collectorvip
· 12-30 15:43
The system of checks and balances... it's really not that simple. The American system is just this tangled.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)