#数字资产市场动态 At the end of the year, a well-known entrepreneur shared an interesting view on wealth: the stocks of two companies they hold are almost their entire net worth, and the rise and fall of these stocks are completely tied to the output of products and services. In other words, the only way to grow one's wealth is to have these companies produce more and provide better services — it sounds simple and straightforward, but the logic is very clear.



What's more interesting is that this logic applies equally to all shareholders, including employees with stock options. When the company's stock appreciates, other investors and internal employees can benefit together. This kind of利益绑定 (interest binding) is actually quite common in the internet and high-tech industries. It forces companies to truly produce things and create value, rather than relying on capital operations to inflate bubbles. From this perspective, the core competitiveness of a company ultimately boils down to the most fundamental question — what can you actually deliver?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatorFlashvip
· 8h ago
Hmm... with such high risk of concentrated holdings, are you still daring to boast? Has the collateralization ratio triggered the threshold?
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiChallengervip
· 2025-12-30 16:17
The irony is that this set of rhetoric appears every bull market, and then in 2018 and 2022, it was proven to be so absurd. The real issue is—data shows that most founders actually don't have that much real cash invested; options, financing dilution, related-party transactions... these are the usual operations. It's not that creating value for the company is wrong, but don't romanticize this process so much that it easily tricks people into taking over.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaWhisperervip
· 2025-12-30 16:03
That's right, this is true alignment. Compared to those projects that are just炒概念 and playing capital games all day, I prefer founders who focus on putting money into actual output. --- But to be honest, how many entrepreneurs really dare to bet their entire fortune on their products? Most still prefer to diversify risk. --- The core is still delivery capability. No matter how much you talk, it’s useless unless the final product can compete. --- I'm interested in employee equity. Only then can the team’s interests be truly aligned, otherwise even the best vision is just empty talk. --- Alright, finally someone is explaining this logic clearly. Web3 should learn from this—stop just making pie-in-the-sky promises.
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_survivorvip
· 2025-12-30 16:01
Well said, this is the right path. Compared to those who spend all day playing capital games, it's more reliable to focus on building solid products.
View OriginalReply0
FallingLeafvip
· 2025-12-30 15:57
Well, the logic is straightforward: get down to real work, no bluffing. It's easy to talk but hard to do. Are there really a few companies doing this now? Everyone is tied to the same boat, and that's the harshest incentive mechanism. I just want to ask, how do those startups that rely on fundraising and burning money survive?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-ccc36bc5vip
· 2025-12-30 15:55
Basically, it's about doing real work vs. armchair strategizing. Reliable entrepreneurs all play this way.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt