2026-01-03 19:20:16

When it comes to decentralization, many discussions are stuck at the theoretical level. You see users are indeed making transactions, but in most cases, they are just signing, and the actual computation logic still runs on various nodes. In this model, users actually have little主动权.

However, some projects are changing their approach. Some new designs enable transactions to be executed directly on the user's device, rather than offloading all the heavy lifting to nodes. As a result, users are not just signers but become actual participants in the entire computation process. This architectural difference may seem like a technical detail, but it actually touches on the core of decentralization—the true dispersal of power and computing capability. Transitioning from node-centric centralized computation to local execution on the client is a significant shift.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

26 Likes

Reward
26
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FOMOmonster

· 01-06 17:08

Basically, everyone was fooling themselves before, signing a name and thinking they achieved decentralization, but in reality, they are still being led around by the node masters. Implementing this idea on the client side is a good approach; now it depends on whether any project can actually deliver it, instead of just another PPT revolution. I'm quite curious about how the performance will be after doing this—will it become another bottleneck?

View OriginalReply0

RunWithRugs

· 01-05 22:48

Haha, this really hits the nail on the head. Someone finally pointed out this pain point. Previously, it was always pretended to be decentralized, but in reality, it just pushed the work to the nodes, and users are still "puppets signing their names." Executing this idea locally on the client side sounds great; it feels like true decentralization. But will it work when actually rolled out? Hopefully it doesn't just become a case of new wine in old bottles. The difficulty of true decentralization has indeed been underestimated; it's not just about slapping on a label. Honestly, I'm looking forward to projects that genuinely want to make changes. Hopefully, they won't just run out of steam after raising funds. Right now, many projects are just playing with concepts. This kind of architecture iteration is where real skill lies.

View OriginalReply0

gaslight_gasfeez

· 01-04 21:43

Basically, most blockchains are still pseudo-decentralized now, and users are just tools. Making computation run on the client side? Sounds good, but I want to see who can really pull it off. Those node folks wouldn't be happy about that; decentralizing power means they can't easily exploit it. Client-side execution sounds great, but for the average person, it's still a high barrier—just a different flavor of the same old story. Wait, isn't this just client-side execution? People have discussed this before. I'm convinced that power should shift to users, but can the infrastructure keep up? Yes, algorithms do need this kind of transformation, but will the implementation be as impactful as the hype suggests?

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapist

· 01-03 19:50

I can't believe someone finally explained this clearly. Most projects just use decentralization as a gimmick, users do nothing but sign, it's hilarious. What's the difference from centralized systems... Only projects that truly give computing power back to users are impressive, this is real power decentralization. --- Implementing this on the client side seems simple, but how thoroughly does the underlying architecture need to be transformed... If it can really be rolled out, that would be the true look of Web3. --- Wait, does this mean the burden on user devices will double? Can my crappy phone handle it... --- Another bunch of projects claiming revolutionary concepts, but in practice, they are the same. It all depends on how well it actually performs when running. --- Exactly, decentralizing computing power is more important than anything else. Otherwise, decentralization is just a joke. --- Local execution sounds good, but how can gas fees and performance be optimized?

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterBearish

· 01-03 19:48

Oh, to be honest, most blockchains are still pseudo-decentralized. Users are just signing machines; the real work is still done by nodes. This new idea is somewhat interesting—giving the computing power back to users? Sounds good, but I'm afraid it might just become another marketing gimmick. Client-side execution definitely changes the game, but how many projects can truly implement it? Those in the know can see the difference, but retail investors are still clueless. Is power really decentralized, or is it just a different way to harvest profits?

View OriginalReply0

LoneValidator

· 01-03 19:41

Yeah, really. That previous approach was just fake decentralization; signing a name and it's done. Focusing on local execution is the right direction. Finally, someone remembers that users are not here to be bystanders. Nodes have enjoyed dividends for so long, now they want to share power? Haha

View OriginalReply0

RugPullAlarm

· 01-03 19:41

True decentralization or PPT decentralization, just look at the on-chain data. For those claiming client-side execution, I want to ask—who will verify? In the end, isn't it still trusting a few major nodes? Can you post the contract audit report, or is it just the old routine of "under audit" again?

View OriginalReply0

GasGasGasBro

· 01-03 19:37

Oh wow, true decentralization hasn't arrived yet; right now it's all just scams. Well said, users dare to boast about decentralization when they don't even have computing power? That's hilarious. Client execution sounds great, but can it actually run? Phones often freeze. This is what I want to see—let us truly take control of the computing power.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiGrayling

· 01-03 19:33

Basically, most blockchains are still just fooling people now. Users are just signing machines, and real power has long been monopolized by the nodes. Wait, are there projects really doing local execution? This is what decentralization should look like. Finally, someone has figured it out.

View OriginalReply0