When evaluating whether you should maintain or adjust your stock holdings heading into 2026, consider this dual-strategy framework. Apple [(NASDAQ: AAPL)] and Berkshire Hathaway [(NYSE: BRK.B)] represent two sides of the modern investment equation—growth exposure paired with defensive financial positioning. Together, they address a fundamental question many investors face: how to balance exposure to cutting-edge technology with portfolio stability.
Apple’s Momentum Story: The Numbers That Matter
Apple’s recent fiscal performance demonstrates genuine business acceleration beyond mere sentiment. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025, the company achieved 8% year-over-year revenue growth, reaching a record $416 billion annually. More importantly, the composition of this revenue is shifting toward higher-margin opportunities.
The services division—Apple’s highest-margin segment—expanded at 15% year-over-year, notably outpacing its full-year growth rate of 13.5%. This acceleration matters because services represent recurring, sticky revenue with superior economics compared to hardware sales.
CFO Kevan Parekh highlighted the scale: “Our September quarter results capped off a record fiscal year, with revenue reaching $416 billion, as well as double-digit EPS growth.” The company’s installed base of active devices hit an all-time high across all product categories and regions, creating the foundation for continued services expansion.
Financially, Apple generated sufficient free cash flow to return substantial capital to shareholders. The company executed $90.7 billion in stock repurchases during the fiscal year while maintaining a net cash position on its balance sheet.
Current valuation stands at approximately 33x forward price-to-earnings. While elevated, management guidance for 10-12% revenue growth in the holiday quarter—driven by iPhone cycle strength and continued double-digit services growth—provides a growth narrative to support these multiples.
Berkshire Hathaway: The Financial Fortress
If Apple represents growth optionality, Berkshire Hathaway provides what might be called “financial insurance.” The conglomerate trades at just 1.6x book value, a conservative valuation relative to its diversified asset base.
The headline figure: over $350 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and Treasury instruments. This war chest represents genuine optionality—the ability to deploy capital into assets at attractive valuations should market dislocations occur. This matters particularly in volatile environments.
Beyond the cash stockpile, Berkshire operates genuinely diversified revenue streams: a substantial insurance operation generating underwriting profits, a major railroad asset, significant energy infrastructure, and numerous other operating businesses. This diversity provides natural hedging against sector-specific downturns.
The contrast with Apple is instructive. Apple generates more than half its revenues from iPhone sales—a concentrated bet on smartphone demand. Berkshire’s diversification offers portfolio ballast precisely when concentrated positions falter.
The Transition Risk Question
Berkshire faces a material structural change. With Warren Buffett transitioning to chairman-only status and Greg Abel assuming full operational control, the investment community must assess whether the company’s legendary capital allocation approach will continue under new leadership.
The stakes are substantial: deploying hundreds of billions productively is extraordinarily difficult. Investors should monitor 2026 M&A activity and investment announcements closely. Abel’s first year will be closely scrutinized.
Understanding the Risks
Apple’s concentration risk is real. Smartphone demand fluctuations would cascade through the financial model. Global geopolitical exposure adds another layer of uncertainty. Most critically, the elevated valuation leaves minimal margin for execution misses.
Berkshire’s leadership transition creates operational uncertainty. There is no guarantee that historical capital deployment excellence transfers seamlessly to new stewardship.
The Strategic Takeaway
When considering whether you should hold or sell your stocks in 2026, think in terms of complementary positioning rather than individual picks. Apple provides growth exposure and technology innovation leverage. Berkshire provides financial flexibility and defensive characteristics. The portfolio logic is sound: one captures accelerating secular trends; the other provides dry powder for volatility-induced opportunities.
Both carry execution risks. Both warrant monitoring throughout 2026. But the fundamental case for maintaining each within a diversified portfolio framework remains intact.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
A Complementary Pair: Why These Two Tech-Sector Holdings Deserve Your Portfolio Attention in 2026
The Case for Strategic Portfolio Positioning
When evaluating whether you should maintain or adjust your stock holdings heading into 2026, consider this dual-strategy framework. Apple [(NASDAQ: AAPL)] and Berkshire Hathaway [(NYSE: BRK.B)] represent two sides of the modern investment equation—growth exposure paired with defensive financial positioning. Together, they address a fundamental question many investors face: how to balance exposure to cutting-edge technology with portfolio stability.
Apple’s Momentum Story: The Numbers That Matter
Apple’s recent fiscal performance demonstrates genuine business acceleration beyond mere sentiment. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025, the company achieved 8% year-over-year revenue growth, reaching a record $416 billion annually. More importantly, the composition of this revenue is shifting toward higher-margin opportunities.
The services division—Apple’s highest-margin segment—expanded at 15% year-over-year, notably outpacing its full-year growth rate of 13.5%. This acceleration matters because services represent recurring, sticky revenue with superior economics compared to hardware sales.
CFO Kevan Parekh highlighted the scale: “Our September quarter results capped off a record fiscal year, with revenue reaching $416 billion, as well as double-digit EPS growth.” The company’s installed base of active devices hit an all-time high across all product categories and regions, creating the foundation for continued services expansion.
Financially, Apple generated sufficient free cash flow to return substantial capital to shareholders. The company executed $90.7 billion in stock repurchases during the fiscal year while maintaining a net cash position on its balance sheet.
Current valuation stands at approximately 33x forward price-to-earnings. While elevated, management guidance for 10-12% revenue growth in the holiday quarter—driven by iPhone cycle strength and continued double-digit services growth—provides a growth narrative to support these multiples.
Berkshire Hathaway: The Financial Fortress
If Apple represents growth optionality, Berkshire Hathaway provides what might be called “financial insurance.” The conglomerate trades at just 1.6x book value, a conservative valuation relative to its diversified asset base.
The headline figure: over $350 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and Treasury instruments. This war chest represents genuine optionality—the ability to deploy capital into assets at attractive valuations should market dislocations occur. This matters particularly in volatile environments.
Beyond the cash stockpile, Berkshire operates genuinely diversified revenue streams: a substantial insurance operation generating underwriting profits, a major railroad asset, significant energy infrastructure, and numerous other operating businesses. This diversity provides natural hedging against sector-specific downturns.
The contrast with Apple is instructive. Apple generates more than half its revenues from iPhone sales—a concentrated bet on smartphone demand. Berkshire’s diversification offers portfolio ballast precisely when concentrated positions falter.
The Transition Risk Question
Berkshire faces a material structural change. With Warren Buffett transitioning to chairman-only status and Greg Abel assuming full operational control, the investment community must assess whether the company’s legendary capital allocation approach will continue under new leadership.
The stakes are substantial: deploying hundreds of billions productively is extraordinarily difficult. Investors should monitor 2026 M&A activity and investment announcements closely. Abel’s first year will be closely scrutinized.
Understanding the Risks
Apple’s concentration risk is real. Smartphone demand fluctuations would cascade through the financial model. Global geopolitical exposure adds another layer of uncertainty. Most critically, the elevated valuation leaves minimal margin for execution misses.
Berkshire’s leadership transition creates operational uncertainty. There is no guarantee that historical capital deployment excellence transfers seamlessly to new stewardship.
The Strategic Takeaway
When considering whether you should hold or sell your stocks in 2026, think in terms of complementary positioning rather than individual picks. Apple provides growth exposure and technology innovation leverage. Berkshire provides financial flexibility and defensive characteristics. The portfolio logic is sound: one captures accelerating secular trends; the other provides dry powder for volatility-induced opportunities.
Both carry execution risks. Both warrant monitoring throughout 2026. But the fundamental case for maintaining each within a diversified portfolio framework remains intact.