At the 2025 T-EDGE Global Dialogue, a private summit brought together five prominent digital asset fund managers to dissect the evolving landscape of fund management post-1011 Black Swan event. Their insights reveal a fundamental reshaping of how professionals approach digital asset management in an increasingly regulated environment.
The Great Migration: From On-Chain to Centralized Exchanges
The most striking consensus among panelists was the accelerating shift toward centralized exchange infrastructure for large-scale capital deployment. Rather than relying on decentralized protocols, institutional players are gravitating toward compliant brokers and major CEX platforms. This transition reflects a pragmatic acknowledgment that on-chain strategies, while theoretically appealing, carry execution risks and liquidity constraints that institutional allocators can no longer tolerate.
One key takeaway: centralized exchanges now dominate the institutional digital asset management space, not due to ideology but due to operational necessity. Risk mitigation has become the primary driver of infrastructure choices in digital asset management.
AI as Supporting Cast, Not Lead Actor
A counterintuitive finding emerged regarding artificial intelligence tools. Rather than serving as primary decision engines, AI is positioned as an analytical support system. Fund managers view AI as a tool for pattern recognition and data processing, but reserve final portfolio decisions for human judgment. This reflects a mature understanding that digital asset management requires contextual wisdom that algorithms alone cannot replicate.
The Risk Management Imperative
The panel articulated three core defensive strategies shaping digital asset management decisions:
High-Liquidity Focus: Managers are deliberately concentrating exposure in major assets and liquid tokens, moving away from long-tail investments.
Small-Cap Reduction: Allocations to low-cap tokens are being systematically trimmed, reflecting heightened wariness about market manipulation and illiquidity events.
Strategy Diversification: Rather than betting on a single thesis, digital asset management teams are building portfolios across multiple strategies and asset classes to reduce correlation-driven losses.
Building the Right Team
Fund selection ultimately hinges on personnel. The discussion underscored that experience navigating volatility cycles and proven risk management capabilities are non-negotiable criteria. For investors evaluating digital asset management providers, team pedigree and demonstrated crisis performance should be primary considerations.
The 2025 landscape suggests digital asset management is entering a consolidation phase where only disciplined, risk-conscious operators thrive.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The Turning Point for Digital Asset Management: Why CEX-Based Strategies Are Replacing On-Chain Models in 2025
At the 2025 T-EDGE Global Dialogue, a private summit brought together five prominent digital asset fund managers to dissect the evolving landscape of fund management post-1011 Black Swan event. Their insights reveal a fundamental reshaping of how professionals approach digital asset management in an increasingly regulated environment.
The Great Migration: From On-Chain to Centralized Exchanges
The most striking consensus among panelists was the accelerating shift toward centralized exchange infrastructure for large-scale capital deployment. Rather than relying on decentralized protocols, institutional players are gravitating toward compliant brokers and major CEX platforms. This transition reflects a pragmatic acknowledgment that on-chain strategies, while theoretically appealing, carry execution risks and liquidity constraints that institutional allocators can no longer tolerate.
One key takeaway: centralized exchanges now dominate the institutional digital asset management space, not due to ideology but due to operational necessity. Risk mitigation has become the primary driver of infrastructure choices in digital asset management.
AI as Supporting Cast, Not Lead Actor
A counterintuitive finding emerged regarding artificial intelligence tools. Rather than serving as primary decision engines, AI is positioned as an analytical support system. Fund managers view AI as a tool for pattern recognition and data processing, but reserve final portfolio decisions for human judgment. This reflects a mature understanding that digital asset management requires contextual wisdom that algorithms alone cannot replicate.
The Risk Management Imperative
The panel articulated three core defensive strategies shaping digital asset management decisions:
High-Liquidity Focus: Managers are deliberately concentrating exposure in major assets and liquid tokens, moving away from long-tail investments.
Small-Cap Reduction: Allocations to low-cap tokens are being systematically trimmed, reflecting heightened wariness about market manipulation and illiquidity events.
Strategy Diversification: Rather than betting on a single thesis, digital asset management teams are building portfolios across multiple strategies and asset classes to reduce correlation-driven losses.
Building the Right Team
Fund selection ultimately hinges on personnel. The discussion underscored that experience navigating volatility cycles and proven risk management capabilities are non-negotiable criteria. For investors evaluating digital asset management providers, team pedigree and demonstrated crisis performance should be primary considerations.
The 2025 landscape suggests digital asset management is entering a consolidation phase where only disciplined, risk-conscious operators thrive.