2026-01-06 18:23:18

Hyperliquid team executed a routine test transfer, moving 1 $HYPE token as part of their standard workflow ahead of team member distribution. The interesting move here: they routed it through the $USDH market pair. It's a practical choice that demonstrates how the protocol's stablecoin mechanism can facilitate internal operations efficiently.

HYPE-4,19%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

wrekt_but_learning

· 01-09 18:09

Bro, this move is pretty clever. Bypassing USDH to transfer? It feels like testing the real-world scenario of the stablecoin mechanism. Smart.

View OriginalReply0

ChainPoet

· 01-09 18:01

Is that it? A test transfer of a token can also be turned into a story... But using a stablecoin pair for internal processes is indeed clever, saving a lot of gas fees, right?

View OriginalReply0

HashBandit

· 01-08 13:38

lmao routing through USDH for a single token test? back in my mining days we'd just... send it directly, no need for all this theater. but ngl the stablecoin pair thing actually makes sense from a gas optimization angle - fewer hops means lower network congestion. still, feels like overthinking when you could just use L2s and cut fees by 99%. this is why rollups matter fr

Reply0

BakedCatFanboy

· 01-08 03:41

Just one $HYPE moving around in $USDH, this operation looks very internal.

View OriginalReply0

TokenTaxonomist

· 01-06 18:51

lmao one token through usdh pair? let me pull up my spreadsheet real quick... this is just operational theater if you ask me. statistically speaking, the "efficiency" angle here doesn't quite track when you examine the actual on-chain mechanics

Reply0

TokenStorm

· 01-06 18:51

A test transfer with just one token still requires routing through USDH; this operation can't be said to be meaningless... What does on-chain data imply about this approach? I need to backtest the history.

View OriginalReply0

PaperHandSister

· 01-06 18:46

Is it really necessary to analyze so deeply just to test a token transfer? Feels like overanalyzing a bit.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterXiao

· 01-06 18:46

There's not much to say about just a token transfer; it feels like this kind of news is very shallow.

View OriginalReply0