Gate perp DEX

Perp is well known to everyone. As our on-chain perpetual exchange and an important part of our Dr. Han's all-in Web3 initiative, I’ve been using it. The mobile version has now been improved to be almost the same as our app, except for lightning-fast order placement. Everything else is pretty good. Actually, I’ve always had a question: why is the deposit address on Sol, and why are ETH and BSC in EVM? There’s almost a weekly event with hundreds of thousands of dollars involved. You could say they’re throwing money at perp, offering such great benefits. Why only support those three chains and not our own chain and our own stablecoins? I really can’t understand. Just be more decisive, right? We’ve spent so much money—either directly use USDT on Gatechain or GUSD on Gatelayer. The support funded by money shouldn’t just focus on those few chains’ development. Hype is for Arbitrum, Aster is for BSC. Why can’t our deposit address be on our own ecosystem chain? Today, I deposited on BSC and paid a network fee of 0.3 U. I don’t want to pay that fee. I also don’t want to use their broken network. Using Gatelayer’s network fee costs just a few cents, so why not choose this lower-fee option? Is it because everyone uses BSC? So, do we also need to develop the BSC chain? Why indulge BSC? I suggest canceling the deposit addresses for these three chains and only use one of the two I mentioned above. Support should be funded by ourselves, and we should do better for our own chain. Don’t think that the wallet chain has a lot of money and might attract trading. If you want to use it, use our own pure bloodline. Don’t work for BSC.