Honestly, @StandX_Official's order book points system is quite well-designed.

It doesn't treat "placing orders" as a single action for rewards but precisely breaks down the three core dimensions of liquidity:
scale, time, and price.

First, look at position and leverage — points are directly linked to the risk borne by users, which filters out those "symbolic participants."
Those willing to use larger positions and bear real risks to provide market-making liquidity inherently offer more valuable liquidity.

Next, consider order duration — fleeting orders are meaningless; only persistent depth can truly improve the trading experience.
The design of time weighting essentially encourages stable supply rather than short-term speculation.
The price dimension is the soul of this system.

Using bps tiers actually distinguishes between "effective liquidity" and "ineffective display orders":
0–10 bps are given full weight because they are the core contribution to narrowing spreads and optimizing order books;
10–30 bps retain half the weight, proving they still have practical value, just of slightly lower quality;
30–100 bps are weighted very low, mainly to give users a sense of participation rather than recognizing their core role.

The final result is clear:
Points won't flow to orders far from the order book or those that are useless to the market, but will precisely go to three types of participants — those who dare to set prices close to the market, bear risks, and are willing to provide depth long-term.

From an incentive perspective, it breaks the single gameplay of "competing in order quantity" and instead guides everyone to compete on "whose liquidity better matches real market demand."

This design benefits not only users earning points but also the overall quality of the trading order book.