Many people are asking, why didn't MSCI's recent move cause a big surge in Bitcoin's price?
In fact, MSCI did not remove Bitcoin and crypto-related listed companies from the index, that hasn't changed. But they made a new move — as long as these financial companies issue new shares, MSCI will no longer include these newly issued shares in the index components.
The situation was completely different in the past. Every time a company like Strategy issued new shares, large funds tracking the index had to buy a portion of them. This was a passive but steady buying pressure.
Now? The rules have changed. These index funds are no longer forced to absorb the newly issued stocks. Think about what this means — the automatically generated buying demand instantly evaporates. No one is forced to buy, and the appeal of raising funds through issuing new shares is greatly reduced. As a result, the efficiency of raising capital through dilution of equity has significantly decreased.
So don't be surprised why MSCI's announcement this time didn't trigger wild market fluctuations. The logic is quite simple — the automatic buying demand is gone, and the market's certainty-based purchasing power weakens accordingly.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DaoTherapy
· 14h ago
Oh, I see now. I thought it was about to take off again.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Arbitrageur
· 01-09 03:12
lmao the mechanics here are actually just removing guaranteed bid pressure. MSCI basically deleted free money flow.
Reply0
DeFiChef
· 01-08 01:58
Oh, this is the key. It may seem like there's no movement, but actually the rules have changed. Without mandatory buy-ins, who would foolishly step in to take over?
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsShaman
· 01-08 01:55
Oh wow, this wave of MSCI directly cut off passive buying, no wonder the crypto circle isn't buzzing.
The thing about index funds being forced to buy in used to be like automatic money, but now that’s gone, it’s really gone.
Wait a minute, does this mean that future issuance and financing will have to rely more on ourselves?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCrazyGF
· 01-08 01:52
Wow, that move was really brilliant. To put it simply, it's like turning off the automatic harvesting machine for the little guys.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirter
· 01-08 01:49
Oh no, now I understand. MSCI's move is truly devastating.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperer
· 01-08 01:44
nah actually the mechanics here don't even matter that much... forced buying pressure was always the real game, now it's just gone. classic bait-and-switch, msci just pulled the rug on passive demand lol
Reply0
NFTRegretful
· 01-08 01:43
Oh wow, this MSCI move really cuts off the lifeline of passive buying.
Many people are asking, why didn't MSCI's recent move cause a big surge in Bitcoin's price?
In fact, MSCI did not remove Bitcoin and crypto-related listed companies from the index, that hasn't changed. But they made a new move — as long as these financial companies issue new shares, MSCI will no longer include these newly issued shares in the index components.
The situation was completely different in the past. Every time a company like Strategy issued new shares, large funds tracking the index had to buy a portion of them. This was a passive but steady buying pressure.
Now? The rules have changed. These index funds are no longer forced to absorb the newly issued stocks. Think about what this means — the automatically generated buying demand instantly evaporates. No one is forced to buy, and the appeal of raising funds through issuing new shares is greatly reduced. As a result, the efficiency of raising capital through dilution of equity has significantly decreased.
So don't be surprised why MSCI's announcement this time didn't trigger wild market fluctuations. The logic is quite simple — the automatic buying demand is gone, and the market's certainty-based purchasing power weakens accordingly.