MSCI's move on digital asset treasury firms just sent mixed signals. On the surface, keeping these companies in the index looks like a win. But here's the catch—the index provider froze share counts while ETFs finally got regulatory approval. That's the critical detail.



Why does this matter? Frozen share counts mean no new passive capital flowing in through index-tracking funds. Even as spot crypto ETFs get greenlit and attract inflows, institutional money through passive channels gets bottlenecked at the treasury company level.

It's like opening a door while blocking the hallway. The policy sounds accommodating but structurally limits the passive flows these firms would've captured. ETFs can now operate more freely, but the index mechanics work against direct capital allocation to digital asset treasury players.

The real story isn't about inclusion or exclusion—it's about whose money gets through.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OvertimeSquidvip
· 01-10 12:53
Blocking the corridor at the door, this trick is really clever, just superficial talk.
View OriginalReply0
HalfIsEmptyvip
· 01-09 02:17
Oh, I see this trick, looks glamorous on the surface but is actually a dead end... it's the same old story.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHustlervip
· 01-08 02:49
Hmm... the move to freeze the number of shares is indeed quite sneaky.
View OriginalReply0
GasWastervip
· 01-08 02:42
A good appearance can be deceiving. The move to freeze shares is really clever; it seems to be included on the surface but is actually blocking the way.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWalletvip
· 01-08 02:35
It's the same old trick again—appearing open on the surface but secretly restricting behind the scenes.
View OriginalReply0
rugged_againvip
· 01-08 02:33
Coming again with this? It seems that openness is actually just blocking the back door; matters of capital allocation are always much deeper than surface-level articles.
View OriginalReply0
PuzzledScholarvip
· 01-08 02:28
Sigh, it's the same old "door-opening and corridor-blocking" trick. I knew it, it sounds good but in reality... funds just can't flow in at all.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)