Recently, I have been reading a lot of discussions about decentralized storage and RWA, and I noticed a phenomenon—judging whether a crypto project is worth paying attention to doesn't depend on how loud its slogans are, but on whether it has solved real-world pain points and what the user base looks like.

I have always been troubled by two things: NFT metadata storage and on-chain files. Using centralized cloud services makes me afraid of data loss, while traditional storage protocols are ridiculously expensive. Every time I retrieve data, I have to wait, and small files' gas fees are even more discouraging. It wasn't until I came across an emerging storage protocol that I realized there are actually such pragmatic solutions.

What attracted me the most was its Red Stuff encoding technology. At first, I couldn't understand it, but after spending time studying, I figured out that the core logic is actually to use fewer redundant copies, which in turn results in more reliable data security, and the cost has been cut by more than half. This is not just a promise on paper; it’s a real economic benefit.

I personally tried it out by storing a few high-definition NFT original images. The upload speed was obviously much faster—much better than the protocol I previously experimented with. This comparison is not based on feelings but on real user experience. The key point is the cost; after calculation, I saved quite a bit of money.

Looking back now, the reason this project has attracted my long-term attention is because it doesn’t just shout slogans blindly; it truly cares about solving practical problems.