Do you remember the four-year cycle from those years? The data is in front of us, and the cycle interest rate has stabilized at around 22%. After analyzing 99.4% of BTC's historical trends, the four-year compound growth rate is approximately 26%. In other words, even if you buy at the lowest point of the cycle and sell at the next cycle's bottom, you can still earn 22%.
Now, there is much discussion in the community, saying that the four-year cycle is dead. So the question is—if the old cycle really becomes invalid, what would be the cycle gains driven by the capital and institutions behind the new era?
Think about it: when the world's largest capital forces have quietly laid out the basic framework for Bitcoin, and as each country's legal framework is still in negotiation and gradual improvement, the answer is already in mind. The market's logic is changing, but the logic itself has not disappeared.
---
The dollar-cost averaging has reached day 73. Today, I bought 0.00054 BTC at a price of $91,139. The current average price is stuck at $95,168, with a total holding of 0.0493 BTC. Currently, there is an unrealized loss of $195. Continuing steadily.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
25 Likes
Reward
25
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
JustHereForAirdrops
· 01-10 06:32
Is the cycle dead? Haha, let's talk about it later.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdviser
· 01-09 19:31
The idea that a four-year cycle is dead is nonsense; institutional entry should actually make the cycle more regular.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullSurvivor
· 01-08 22:28
Is the four-year cycle dead? Wake up, institutions just changed their wording, but the pattern hasn't changed.
View OriginalReply0
RetailTherapist
· 01-08 02:57
The cycle is dead—this has been said every round. Anyway, I just keep dollar-cost averaging, let the data do the talking.
View OriginalReply0
StealthDeployer
· 01-08 02:55
Is the cycle dead? Wake up, the institutions have long been secretly using the new cycle to harvest retail investors. 22% is a dream for retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
DEXRobinHood
· 01-08 02:53
I don't know if the four-year cycle is dead or alive, but anyway, my average price is back on the bottom-fishing path.
View OriginalReply0
AirDropMissed
· 01-08 02:51
Is the cycle dead? That's hilarious. Institutional entry has actually made the cycle clearer, it's just the magnitude that has changed.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bd883c58
· 01-08 02:41
Is the cycle dead? Wake up, institutions have entered, and the cycle is just beginning.
Do you remember the four-year cycle from those years? The data is in front of us, and the cycle interest rate has stabilized at around 22%. After analyzing 99.4% of BTC's historical trends, the four-year compound growth rate is approximately 26%. In other words, even if you buy at the lowest point of the cycle and sell at the next cycle's bottom, you can still earn 22%.
Now, there is much discussion in the community, saying that the four-year cycle is dead. So the question is—if the old cycle really becomes invalid, what would be the cycle gains driven by the capital and institutions behind the new era?
Think about it: when the world's largest capital forces have quietly laid out the basic framework for Bitcoin, and as each country's legal framework is still in negotiation and gradual improvement, the answer is already in mind. The market's logic is changing, but the logic itself has not disappeared.
---
The dollar-cost averaging has reached day 73. Today, I bought 0.00054 BTC at a price of $91,139. The current average price is stuck at $95,168, with a total holding of 0.0493 BTC. Currently, there is an unrealized loss of $195. Continuing steadily.