2026-01-08 02:29:35

Prism positioning itself as a landing pad for new megaeth really catches my attention—curious how this plays out for user adoption. The problem's been staring us in the face: too many chains launch without a proper entry point. People land, then what? No unified hub to bridge assets, execute swaps, trade, run predictions. It's friction at exactly the wrong moment. Having everything—bridging, swapping, trading tools—stacked in one accessible place changes the onboarding game. New users can actually experience the ecosystem instead of bouncing around scattered protocols. This kind of infrastructure thinking is exactly what gets more people from curious to committed.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

rekt_but_not_broke

· 01-10 18:34

To be honest, the idea of Prism really addresses the pain points. New users won't have to run around everywhere to get started.

View OriginalReply0

fork_in_the_road

· 01-10 16:35

NGL, the Prism concept is actually addressing a common issue... but it really hits the pain point. When newcomers come in, they get overwhelmed by various protocols and end up giving up.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterWang

· 01-10 14:23

Damn, this is exactly the direction I want to see.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaWhisperer

· 01-09 13:58

To be honest, I've been waiting for someone to say this directly for a long time. The moment the new chain launches is indeed a dead point, and most projects haven't even considered this. The Prism approach really hits the pain point.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 01-08 02:59

NGL, the Prism approach really hits the pain point. When a new chain launches, the most likely to fall behind are those who have nowhere to start.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSunriser

· 01-08 02:58

To be honest, I think Prism's move is quite clever. Finally, someone remembers that newcomers get confused by various protocols. Wait, no, the real problem is that the ecosystem is too fragmented. Now I understand why so many users are leaving. One-stop entry truly changes the game rules, much better than the chaotic approach before. If this time they can truly connect wallets, bridges, and trading, maybe they can really get something done. But let's wait and see. The concept sounds great, but whether it can be implemented is another matter.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainTherapist

· 01-08 02:54

Basically, someone finally thought of solving the problem of new user entry hell, but whether Prism can really do a good job depends on it.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller

· 01-08 02:54

NGL, the prism idea is still interesting, and finally someone is thinking about the new user experience... But then again, this kind of aggregation platform was tried a couple of years ago, so why hasn't it become popular yet...

View OriginalReply0

HallucinationGrower

· 01-08 02:48

NGL Prism's approach indeed hits the mark. The most awkward part of launching a new chain is the difficulty of entry. --- Wait, can a single hub really solve the problem of new user attrition? Or is it just shifting the problem somewhere else? --- I agree with this logic, but the key is to have traffic. Even the best onboarding tools are useless if no one uses them. --- Finally, someone has thought of user experience. Too many projects overlook the value of such infrastructure. --- Recalling those public chains that were flooded earlier, few of them truly considered how newcomers would enter. --- A single entry point is nice, but I'm worried it might become another centralized bottleneck.

View OriginalReply0

MondayYoloFridayCry