Tech giants are moving faster and faster. Meta recently announced the acquisition of Manus, an AI startup focused on autonomous agents. This is not just a simple technology merger; it reflects the intense competition across the entire AI sector—big companies are racing in speed and scale.
What makes Manus special? It is a general-purpose AI agent capable of autonomously completing complex tasks with minimal instructions. This capability drew significant attention earlier this year. The company was initially founded in China but later relocated to Singapore as its new base due to shifts in the international landscape.
However, behind this acquisition lies a more thought-provoking phenomenon: the development speed of centralized AI is surpassing expectations, while decentralized AI solutions are facing increasing pressure. The window of opportunity for Web3 innovators is narrowing—meaning that without accelerating their pace, they are likely to be gradually overtaken by the capital and technological advantages of large corporations. In other words, this is not just a competition in the AI market; it is a real dialogue between different technological approaches.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityWhisperer
· 18m ago
Damn, another one got eaten. Web3 is still sharpening its tools while the big players are already starting to harvest...
---
The window of opportunity is narrowing, and that really hits hard, but we need to accelerate, brothers.
---
Centralization crushing decentralization, this round is a bit tense.
---
Meta's move to buy Manus shows they’ve also seen through the general agency model; we can't keep up with their speed.
---
Speaking of which, Manus fled from China to Singapore, then was acquired by Meta... this script is quite ironic, huh?
---
The question is, can Web3 afford this price? There's simply no comparison.
---
If decentralized AI doesn't get serious soon, it will truly become just a slogan.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 01-08 23:03
Coming back to buy the dip? After the big companies finish eating up the Chinese market, it should be Web3's turn.
Saying the window period is narrowing is an understatement; we are being repeatedly harvested.
Meta's move was too clever, directly shutting down innovation in the intelligent agent field.
Centralized or decentralized, in the end, it's still about who has more money and more people.
Teams like Manus being swallowed up—how many small projects will dare to develop AI agents afterward?
But on the other hand, Web3 really needs to be more aggressive; if we wait any longer, there will truly be no chance.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiAnon
· 01-08 03:56
Meta's move is really ruthless, directly acquiring Manus and calling it a day. We're still exploring in Web3.
The window period has indeed narrowed, but decentralizing AI doesn't necessarily mean we've lost. It all depends on who can come out first.
Big companies are pouring money and scaling up, but we're competing for true autonomy. That's the key.
Another promising project has been acquired, and this is the reality.
Wait, is there really that much pressure on decentralized AI solutions, or are we overthinking it?
Centralized systems win in speed, but who knows in the long run?
When Meta makes a move, everyone gets nervous, but honestly, the Web3 track hasn't truly exploded yet.
View OriginalReply0
Anon4461
· 01-08 03:55
The window period is narrowing, it sounds really hopeless, but are we just going to sit and wait for death?
---
It's the same old trick of big companies eating small companies. When will the script of capital crushing innovation change?
---
Meta's crazy acquisitions are probably just afraid of decentralized solutions. Honestly, it's still about抢时间抢人才 (racing against time and talent).
---
It's not unfair that Manus was acquired. The centralized side is indeed fast enough to scare people, while Web3 is still debating token incentives.
---
Looks like we need to work overtime, or we'll really be beaten down.
---
Basically, this is a speed race. Whoever runs faster wins. It looks a bit uncertain right now.
---
Moved from China to Singapore and then bought by Meta. This move is indeed quite interesting.
---
Oh my, the pace feels like decentralization is being pressed to the ground and rubbed in.
---
As expected, big companies just throw money to crush people and time. What do we have to compare with them?
---
Autonomous agency is indeed a key track. Monopolization by big companies will really be uncomfortable.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainGossiper
· 01-08 03:46
Here we go again, Meta's speed is truly impressive.
The window period narrowing is indeed heartbreaking. Big companies just throw money around; how do we play?
Manus's technology is indeed solid, autonomously completing complex tasks... No wonder it caught attention.
Centralized crushing decentralized? It still depends on who can truly implement it in the end.
But to be fair, intense technological competition isn't a bad thing in itself; it's better than no one caring.
Everyone is running; it all comes down to who can hold on until the end.
View OriginalReply0
ShamedApeSeller
· 01-08 03:30
The window period is really narrowing, but to be honest, money talks. Big companies are investing money at a pace we can't keep up with.
---
Meta is playing chess again. The centralized AI side is indeed aggressive, and it feels like the decentralized side is falling behind in the rhythm.
---
If Manus is taken down, it's gone. At this rate, high-quality AI projects will all be absorbed by big corporations.
---
That's right, this wave is indeed a struggle between systems. On the centralized side, talent and funds are pouring in, and we need to think about how to break the deadlock.
---
Really, this is no longer just competition; it's an ecosystem war... The era where big companies can crush with their resources has arrived.
View OriginalReply0
RektButStillHere
· 01-08 03:26
The window period is indeed shrinking, and the era of big companies monopolizing is here
---
Meta is starting to stockpile again, this pace is really a bit crazy
---
Centralization crushes decentralization, Web3 needs to get serious, if we keep delaying, there will be no future
---
Manus was acquired this time, which is a bit frustrating; it could have gone the distributed route
---
To put it simply, it's still a game of money and speed; small teams find it hard to withstand this pressure
---
That's why some people are still pondering AI代理, while big companies have already started buying and buying
---
Decentralized AI sounds great, but big companies pouring in money make it hard to sustain; reality is quite stark
---
It feels like the entire track has been locked in, slow-moving innovators are really in danger
---
Another creative idea eaten up; this is the advantage of centralized systems
Tech giants are moving faster and faster. Meta recently announced the acquisition of Manus, an AI startup focused on autonomous agents. This is not just a simple technology merger; it reflects the intense competition across the entire AI sector—big companies are racing in speed and scale.
What makes Manus special? It is a general-purpose AI agent capable of autonomously completing complex tasks with minimal instructions. This capability drew significant attention earlier this year. The company was initially founded in China but later relocated to Singapore as its new base due to shifts in the international landscape.
However, behind this acquisition lies a more thought-provoking phenomenon: the development speed of centralized AI is surpassing expectations, while decentralized AI solutions are facing increasing pressure. The window of opportunity for Web3 innovators is narrowing—meaning that without accelerating their pace, they are likely to be gradually overtaken by the capital and technological advantages of large corporations. In other words, this is not just a competition in the AI market; it is a real dialogue between different technological approaches.