2026-01-08 03:27:16

In the highly competitive BNB Chain ecosystem, there's a way to efficiently unlock asset liquidity without taking losses.

Recently, I experienced a BNBFi protocol that integrates liquidity staking, collateralized lending, and borrowing functions, and I found several interesting aspects. This protocol once reached a peak total locked value of $4.3 billion, indicating it has indeed attracted a large number of users.

Where is the core appeal? First, cost advantage—by collateralizing BNB assets, you can borrow USD1 stablecoins at extremely low costs. What does this mean? Your BNB remains in your wallet with potential for appreciation, while you also gain liquidity to invest or participate in other projects, effectively "killing two birds with one stone."

Even more impressive is ecosystem synergy. The protocol's liquidity staking tokens like slisBNB and slisBNBx not only help you earn staking rewards but also seamlessly connect to leading platform Launchpool and Megadrop projects. In other words, a single asset can generate multiple benefits—staking rewards + project participation opportunities + potential airdrops. This "multiple gains with one action" design is quite attractive for users looking to maximize capital efficiency.

Overall, this system dissects the functions of lending protocols in detail, allowing users to combine features as needed. Whether aiming for stable returns or participating in ecosystem opportunities, it seems there are suitable ways to engage.

BNB-0,76%

USD1-0,06%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OvertimeSquid

· 01-11 02:48

It sounds like the typical "one coin multiple eats" scheme, but borrowing stablecoins at low interest definitely has some value. Compared to directly selling coins, it's much more cost-effective. --- 43 billion locked at peak? That was really intense back then. How much is left now? That’s the real question. --- Wait, can staking still participate in Launchpool? Isn’t that basically free participation rights? Feels a bit too perfect. --- Holding BNB for appreciation and borrowing against it—I understand the logic, but the demand for stablecoins needs to be high enough; otherwise, borrowing is pointless. --- Another combo package, just listen to it. The actual operation is definitely more complicated than written, and all the risks are covered for you. --- The name slisBNB is really confusing. Let’s talk about the specific interest rate—how reliable is it? --- I just want to know one thing—what is the current TVL of this protocol? The 4.3 billion was a historical high. --- Single-asset multiple yield sounds great, but it also comes with multiple risks. Who can guarantee that no part will have issues? --- With the BNBFi track so competitive, why has this protocol survived until now? There must be something I haven’t seen.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroEnjoyer

· 01-08 03:57

This gameplay sounds pretty good, but the most important thing is that the gas fees need to be reasonable; otherwise, no matter how much profit you make, it's all for nothing.

View OriginalReply0

StableGeniusDegen

· 01-08 03:56

It sounds great to have both fish and bear paws, but is it really so perfect? Low-interest USDT borrowing for multiple yields is indeed tempting, but I'm worried about a wave of corrections wiping out the principal. This kind of nested multi-layered yield seems like the risk is also stacking up. Has anyone suffered losses? The peak of 4.3 billion sounds impressive, but how much is currently locked? Is the high staking yield of slisBNB just an early incentive? Will it underperform later? Just give it a try. Anyway, I have extra idle funds, so I might as well gamble on the luck of a new protocol. I need to do more research on this kind of layered yield. The logic seems sound, but the execution details might have pitfalls.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 01-08 03:55

Having both fish and bear paws is nice, but is collateralizing BNB to borrow stablecoins really that low risk? It still seems like you need to clearly understand the liquidation line. Wow, multiple yields sound great, but in practice, could gas fees and slippage wipe out your gains? slisBNBx feels like it has a pretty high barrier; can ordinary retail investors really play with it? Wait, is the protocol with a TVL of 4.3 billion still alive? It seems like many protocols in the BNB ecosystem have been rugging in the past two years. Staking yields + Launchpool together seem interesting, but I wonder how much the actual APY can be.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedNotStirred

· 01-08 03:36

Sounds good, but I'm worried it might be the next Luna... --- Multiple yields, but I always feel something's off. --- Staking BNB to borrow USD1, I've seen this play before, why does it always seem risky? --- Getting both fish and bear paws? Sounds nice, but isn't it just a scheme? --- How's the peak TVL of 4.3 billion? How much is left now? --- Hmm... Be cautious with liquidity staking tokens paired with Launchpool; multi-chain ecosystems are tricky. --- I just want to know how many active users this protocol currently has. --- Listening to single-transaction multiple yields is fine, but if you're really moving money, you need to be cautious. --- Are derivatives like slisBNBx really low-risk? --- Is borrowing USD1 stablecoins really "extremely low" cost? What are the details?

View OriginalReply0