Recently, I wandered around a major exchange's marketplace and found a bunch of Meme coins being aggressively promoted. One project called "Pig Foot Rice" caught my attention—it seems quite active, with only 4,000 token holders, and the smart contract looks fine. But upon closer inspection, the situation gets complicated.



I pulled up the top holder rankings, and the address in first place holds 13%, which is already suspicious enough. Digging deeper, I found that this top address is making frantic transfers. Tracking the flow of funds revealed the truth—these tokens were all directly distributed from the minting address (0x00).

What's more interesting is that this main controlling address not only manipulates this one project but also created another token called "Pig Foot Rice." Two projects, similar tactics, and comparable holder concentration. Connecting all the clues, it becomes clear: the project team issued multiple tokens with the same or similar names in bulk, then dispersed them to different wallet addresses, organizing promoters in the marketplace to carry out wave after wave of hype. When the hype builds up, the chips are released at zero cost, and then sold off all at once.

Over the years, I've seen many Meme coin stories—some have indeed become popular, but they all follow a pattern: truly valuable projects must be tempered by time and market cleansing. Those promises of overnight riches are often born this way.
MEME-3,14%
PIG6,41%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MemeCoinSavantvip
· 22h ago
yo this is literally textbook pump & dump wrapped in a "猪脚饭" skin lmao... 13% concentration from genesis address screaming louder than any chart ever could ngl
Reply0
orphaned_blockvip
· 01-09 17:38
It's the same old trick, I'm already tired of it.
View OriginalReply0
ShadowStakervip
· 01-08 04:03
ngl, the 13% concentration thing is such a classic tell. seen this playbook run a thousand times already—diff tokens, same deploys, same wallets orchestrating the whole thing. zero-cost supply dumps never end well fr
Reply0
MerkleTreeHuggervip
· 01-08 04:00
It's the same old trick again, mass issuing tokens under different aliases to continue harvesting profits.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandladyvip
· 01-08 03:49
It's the same old trick again, always the same every time.
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWellvip
· 01-08 03:47
It's the same old trick again—mass issuing tokens and dumping them all at once. I've seen through it. Wait, two tokens with the same name? That's a clever move. Daring to boast about 4000 addresses being active—laughable. Looks like I need to be more cautious. From zero cost to overnight riches, the newbies will never learn. No matter how deep the tactics, they can't escape the flaw of coin concentration. Good analysis.
View OriginalReply0
down_only_larryvip
· 01-08 03:47
Once again, the same old trick, calling pork chop rice a project? These addresses should really be put on the blacklist.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt