Those dismissing AI-powered natural language coding frameworks might be underestimating how fast things are shifting. I know this firsthand—used to be skeptical too.
At its core, programming is simply instructing a computer in a formal syntax. AI disrupts this equation fundamentally: it converts English into executable code. That's the real play here. The barrier isn't the language anymore—it's the clarity of what you actually want built. Precision becomes everything. And that precision? That's entirely on the user now.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TradFiRefugee
· 01-11 03:19
Oh, you're right. I used to be skeptical too, but now I really can't turn back.
---
Figuring out what you want is more important than knowing how to code.
---
This move definitely changes the game rules, no objections accepted.
---
Here's the problem: what about those confused clients? Doesn't this just expose them?
---
Will non-developers be able to convert English to code in the future? That's a bit scary.
---
All the accuracy depends on the user, and it feels like new problems are emerging.
---
Basically, it's still about prompt engineering for a living, just a different approach.
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAll
· 01-10 21:52
Hi, I really understand this point. I didn't believe in this before... Now it seems the threshold has really shifted. It's no longer a language issue; it purely depends on how clearly you think.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 01-08 04:51
To be honest, I didn't believe in AI programming before, but now I've been proven wrong. The key isn't whether you can write code, but whether you can clearly communicate your requirements.
---
Accuracy is the real bottleneck, not the language itself. I have deep personal experience with this.
---
Those who criticize AI programming every day are actually just not keeping up with the pace. Change your mindset, everyone.
---
So the core competitiveness has shifted from coding skills to "how to express ideas precisely," which is quite interesting.
---
Lowering the threshold actually raises the requirements. Isn't that ironic?
View OriginalReply0
HashRatePhilosopher
· 01-08 04:49
Well... it sounds pretty right, but how many people can truly think clearly about what they want?
View OriginalReply0
CascadingDipBuyer
· 01-08 04:28
Haha, you're right. I used to think AI programming was just so-so, and now I really regret underestimating it.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerAirdrop
· 01-08 04:27
Forget it, honestly, it still depends on people to clearly define the requirements. AI can't save projects where the requirement documents are written like crap.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeJumper
· 01-08 04:26
To be honest, I didn't believe in AI programming before, but now I've really been proven wrong... Accuracy is the key.
View OriginalReply0
LeverageAddict
· 01-08 04:23
Honestly, I used to think these AI programming tools were a bit overhyped... but now I'm a little panicked.
Those dismissing AI-powered natural language coding frameworks might be underestimating how fast things are shifting. I know this firsthand—used to be skeptical too.
At its core, programming is simply instructing a computer in a formal syntax. AI disrupts this equation fundamentally: it converts English into executable code. That's the real play here. The barrier isn't the language anymore—it's the clarity of what you actually want built. Precision becomes everything. And that precision? That's entirely on the user now.