The partnership between major ZK infrastructure teams announced late December keeps proving relevant. With ASIC hardware now coming online for proof generation, we're seeing a meaningful shift in economics—proving costs dropping while throughput improves, all without creating new centralization bottlenecks.
This matters because it addresses a real pain point. When hardware acceleration rolls out properly, proof generation becomes faster and cheaper for everyone participating in the network. No single entity controls the compute layer. That's the kind of infrastructure evolution the ecosystem actually needs right now.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTArchaeologis
· 2h ago
In December, Nabo ZK infrastructure collaboration, it now seems to be addressing real pain points. Once hardware acceleration is rolled out, costs decrease and throughput increases without falling into the centralization trap—this sense of balance is rare. It's a bit like the early days of digital art communities exploring decentralized creation rights, finally taking shape at the infrastructure level.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropBro
· 01-09 12:09
Hardware acceleration really needs to be approached carefully; I'm worried that in the end, it will still be monopolized by a few large miners.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 01-08 04:51
zk this time is truly different. The cost of launching ASIC hardware has directly dropped, and the key is that no new centralization has emerged. This is what I want to see.
View OriginalReply0
ForkLibertarian
· 01-08 04:48
zk this time is truly technological empowerment, not a capital game
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBro
· 01-08 04:43
Damn, the ASIC launch really changes the game. Costs drop dramatically, and they’re not centralizing. This is what I want to see.
View OriginalReply0
0xInsomnia
· 01-08 04:37
zkVM is really stable this time. With hardware acceleration launched, the cost is directly halved, and the key is that no new pits have been dug yet.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 01-08 04:35
ZK hardware acceleration definitely needs to be prioritized. Lower costs and increased throughput—that's what you call a win-win.
View OriginalReply0
RadioShackKnight
· 01-08 04:32
NGL, this time zk hardware acceleration is truly different. The cost has come down, and performance has improved... This is the way it should be.
The partnership between major ZK infrastructure teams announced late December keeps proving relevant. With ASIC hardware now coming online for proof generation, we're seeing a meaningful shift in economics—proving costs dropping while throughput improves, all without creating new centralization bottlenecks.
This matters because it addresses a real pain point. When hardware acceleration rolls out properly, proof generation becomes faster and cheaper for everyone participating in the network. No single entity controls the compute layer. That's the kind of infrastructure evolution the ecosystem actually needs right now.