2026-01-08 04:25:00

Recently, major generative AI companies have launched an interesting feature — users can connect medical records and various health apps (Apple Health, MyFitnessPal, etc.) to the AI assistant, which will then provide suggestions based on your health data. Sounds a bit like a data aggregator, doesn’t it?

The core selling point of this feature is actually privacy storage — your health data is stored in a relatively independent space. For those of us concerned about data ownership, this approach is definitely worth considering. It can help users understand their test results, optimize diet and exercise plans, and even support pre-visit preparations.

Interestingly, MSCI has recently begun to consider including digital asset treasury companies. This reflects a subtle shift in the mainstream financial system’s attitude towards on-chain asset management. The application boundaries of assets like $ETH, $WLD, and $TAO seem to be expanding accordingly. Perhaps in the future, our way of viewing data management and asset management will become more blurred.

ETH1,53%

WLD5,6%

TAO0,1%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RebaseVictim

· 01-09 21:39

You've heard the rhetoric about data privacy many times, but the key is how they actually use your data to make money. Can it truly be verified on-chain?

View OriginalReply0

FlatlineTrader

· 01-08 18:34

Privacy storage sounds good, but honestly, the data ultimately still resides on their servers. How can there be true autonomy?

View OriginalReply0

FreeRider

· 01-08 17:03

Privacy storage sounds pretty good, but are they really locking down the data? Or are they just changing the name and continuing to collect?

View OriginalReply0

GweiWatcher

· 01-08 04:54

Privacy storage sounds good, but the data is still on their servers. To put it simply, it's just stored somewhere else.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseTrendSister

· 01-08 04:54

We've heard too many speeches about data privacy; the key is actual implementation, otherwise it's just old wine in new bottles. Honestly, mainstream finance embracing on-chain assets is way more interesting than AI medical functions. It's the "privacy storage" again—wake up, everyone. True autonomy still depends on the blockchain. MSCI's recent moves are interesting; it feels like traditional finance is being forced to evolve. If you ask me, instead of trusting big companies' privacy promises, it's better to manage health data directly on the blockchain.

View OriginalReply0

governance_ghost

· 01-08 04:54

Data privacy hype is just that, in the end, you still have to trust the centralized folks. --- Wait, MSCI is starting to recognize on-chain assets? That's the real point, traditional finance is really loosening up. --- Medical data and asset data are finally going to merge. Web3 should be like this. --- Don't be fooled by "independent space," they still call the shots. --- ETH, WLD, TAO boundary expansion... Is this really happening? --- The rhetoric about privacy storage feels a bit over the top. How is it better than centralized? --- Mainstream finance is starting to move on-chain... Hmm, maybe we were really right to bet on this. --- Medical + asset management blurring? Sounds fresh, but who guarantees data security? --- This is what I call innovation, unlike some projects that boast every day. --- The concept of data ownership is finally being promoted by big companies. Progress is not that fast.

View OriginalReply0

PessimisticOracle

· 01-08 04:35

Privacy storage sounds good, but can you really trust it? Anyway, I wouldn't throw all my health data into AI.

View OriginalReply0

DuckFluff

· 01-08 04:33

Privacy storage sounds good, but it's still collecting your data—AI giants are all using this trick. Speaking of MSCI including on-chain assets, it does have some interesting aspects; mainstream institutions are quietly accumulating positions. The boundary between data and assets is really becoming more and more blurred; we need to be more cautious.

View OriginalReply0

VCsSuckMyLiquidity

· 01-08 04:26

The talk about privacy storage is just for listening; in the end, the data still belongs to the big companies. --- Wait, MSCI including on-chain assets? If that really happens, mainstream finance will have to reshuffle. --- Medical data + AI, honestly, it depends on whether you're willing to share it. I wouldn't dare to gamble. --- Data ownership? Ha, stop joking. Once you sign the terms, it’s no longer yours. --- ETH, TAO—this could be an opportunity. The boundaries of asset management are becoming blurred, and the ecosystem will explode. --- Feels like more marketing talk—"privacy independent space." I've heard too many of these promises. --- The truly valuable ones are those willing to put their data on the chain. Decentralization is the way out. --- MSCI taking this step shows traditional finance is starting to take on-chain seriously. Quite interesting. --- Connecting medical records with AI assistants is comfortable, but what about my genetic data? --- When the mainstream financial system quietly shifts, it's time for retail investors to wake up.

View OriginalReply0