I have some recent thoughts on the trend predictions for several cryptocurrencies, and I’d like to share them with you.
Taking BREV as an example, yesterday’s judgment was basically in line with expectations—when I posted, the price was around 0.38, and it briefly reached 0.54 in a short period, a pretty good increase. The reason these predictions can be relatively accurate mainly lies in understanding the project cycle and capital dynamics.
Last month at the end of the month, I made directional judgments on River and ZKP. At that time, River’s fourth-quarter social activities had just started. Based on the price behavior patterns from previous quarters, such events usually trigger a pump. Plus, there was an upcoming token unlock period. From the project team’s perspective, raising the price can attract more retail investors to hold at high levels, making their holdings more valuable when the unlock occurs—that’s a straightforward logic.
The situation with ZKP is even more interesting. At that time, I observed that the top holdings were mostly well-known institutions, and some institutions’ average purchase prices were far below the market price. Institutional investors generally don’t make unprofitable trades, which means they have clear expectations for the subsequent trend, making a sharp rise quite likely.
Trading isn’t really mysterious; the key is whether you can see through the project cycle, institutional movements, and the subtle relationships in capital flow. Patience and waiting for the most certain moment to act often yield better results than frequent trading.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GhostInTheChain
· 01-10 16:37
This guy's point is right; it's better to see how institutions buy rather than compare with their poor performance.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 01-08 18:55
I'm really impressed with BREV's recent surge, but I still have some reservations about the institutional holding logic.
I've chased the highs a few times and got caught, now I just want to quietly make money.
The idea is clear, but the key is whether the execution can keep up.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMistaker
· 01-08 04:49
Haha, BREV indeed bottomed out this time, from 0.38 to 0.54. Your analysis is really quite accurate.
I've always believed in institutional holdings; they wouldn't lose money without reason. Following big funds is never wrong.
This logic can also be applied to other coins, right? Are there any new promising targets you've recently looked at?
Wait, you mentioned that unlocking periods are used to manipulate the market. Do project teams all play this way?
Hezi, it seems your methodology is really just about understanding human nature and cycle patterns.
Next time, can you reveal it in advance so we can band together for mutual support?
View OriginalReply0
OffchainOracle
· 01-08 04:48
Bro, I've heard this theory many times, but indeed, BREV's move was a highlight.
Does low institutional holding always mean a big surge? That logic has a pretty big flaw. There are probably quite a few institutions caught in traps too.
But I do agree that the certainty of ambush is much better than those who chase highs and sell lows every day.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntress
· 01-08 04:46
It's a showdown—relying on dissecting tokenomics and tracking whale wallets to make a living... Data shows that this approach can indeed work, but the prerequisite is patience, which most people can't manage.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmare
· 01-08 04:45
Well, that's why following the trend leads to losses. You need to learn how to read institutional chips.
View OriginalReply0
FloorSweeper
· 01-08 04:36
Wow, BREV indeed successfully bottomed out this time. How did I not see it coming from 0.38 to 0.54?
The logic is indeed clear. The institutional holdings at low prices— I remember the discussions about ZKP back then.
Waiting for certainty to ambush tests your patience. Many people suffer heavy losses from frequent trading.
River's unlocking period to pump the price is an old trick; that's how the project team operates.
It's easy to say but hard to do. Few people can truly grasp the rhythm.
Would you like to share how to track institutional movements?
I have some recent thoughts on the trend predictions for several cryptocurrencies, and I’d like to share them with you.
Taking BREV as an example, yesterday’s judgment was basically in line with expectations—when I posted, the price was around 0.38, and it briefly reached 0.54 in a short period, a pretty good increase. The reason these predictions can be relatively accurate mainly lies in understanding the project cycle and capital dynamics.
Last month at the end of the month, I made directional judgments on River and ZKP. At that time, River’s fourth-quarter social activities had just started. Based on the price behavior patterns from previous quarters, such events usually trigger a pump. Plus, there was an upcoming token unlock period. From the project team’s perspective, raising the price can attract more retail investors to hold at high levels, making their holdings more valuable when the unlock occurs—that’s a straightforward logic.
The situation with ZKP is even more interesting. At that time, I observed that the top holdings were mostly well-known institutions, and some institutions’ average purchase prices were far below the market price. Institutional investors generally don’t make unprofitable trades, which means they have clear expectations for the subsequent trend, making a sharp rise quite likely.
Trading isn’t really mysterious; the key is whether you can see through the project cycle, institutional movements, and the subtle relationships in capital flow. Patience and waiting for the most certain moment to act often yield better results than frequent trading.