In the ecosystem landscape of the Sui blockchain, an emerging storage protocol is gaining attention. Its uniqueness lies in the combination of "programmable storage + RWA tokenization," aiming to address long-standing pain points in decentralized storage.



From a technical perspective, the protocol's killer feature is the Red Stuff two-dimensional erasure coding scheme. It sounds complex, but simply put: it aims to maintain the high efficiency of erasure coding storage while avoiding the high costs associated with data repair in traditional schemes. Through matrix encoding and the design of primary and secondary slices, data recovery requires only one slice, significantly reducing bandwidth consumption and directly matching the performance metrics of centralized storage solutions.

This technical architecture is specifically designed for large-capacity, unstructured data—such as video files, AI training datasets, and various rich media content—enabling efficient management. Even more impressively, metadata is stored directly on-chain, with deep integration into smart contracts, making complex scenarios like real-time data streams and dynamic interactions possible. For the DeFi ecosystem, this provides a reliable infrastructure.

Looking at the token side, the value backing of the WAL token comes from two sources: first, the ecosystem itself needs this (a necessity), and second, a complete economic cycle has been designed. As a native token, WAL is not only a governance tool but also a value carrier for various applications within the ecosystem. This design creates a situation where projects, investors, and developers share aligned interests.

Overall, infrastructure projects like this tend to more easily accumulate ecosystem assets and developer communities. Walrus's differentiated advantage in the storage sector is already quite clear; the next step is to see whether ecosystem applications can keep pace.
SUI1,6%
WAL0,19%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropChaservip
· 01-10 14:46
Is the erasure coding scheme really going to take off? Feels like another PPT plan. --- Why does the wav coin economic model still look the same old, same old? Can they come up with some new tricks? --- Good grief, infrastructure and RWA again—who dares to shout these words now? --- Storage has long been a competitive field. Why can Walrus stand out from the crowd? --- Metadata on-chain contract linkage... sounds good, but I'm worried it's just a slogan over substance. --- Having a token with real demand support is good, but the key is whether users will actually buy in. --- The Red Stuff scheme does have some substance, but the performance claims are a bit overhyped. --- Sui ecosystem projects burn out quickly after a surge—can Walrus sustain it? --- Looking for investment opportunities in storage protocols? Might as well go to gambling. --- The pain point in AI training datasets is real; it depends on whether they can truly solve it.
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairyvip
· 01-10 06:34
honestly the erasure code bandwidth arbitrage here is *chef's kiss* but nobody's talking about the real oracle manipulation vector lurking in on-chain metadata... that's the alpha leak nobody deserves
Reply0
SolidityNewbievip
· 01-08 09:45
Red Code Erasure Code sounds impressive, but how does it actually perform in practice? Still on the sidelines. --- The design of WAL tokens, to put it nicely, is called an economic cycle; to be blunt, isn't it just a pump-and-dump scheme? --- Another new project in the storage track—this time, is it really different? I doubt it. --- Another infrastructure in the Sui ecosystem, but whether developers will buy into it is the real key. --- RWA + Storage? Feels like a forced combination—do we really have such a strong need for it? --- On-chain metadata combined with DeFi sounds very Web3, but where are the actual use cases? --- With reduced bandwidth consumption, can costs really be lowered? Or is it just another theoretical figure? --- Walrus needs to gain popularity; whether the ecosystem applications can keep up is crucial. It's too early to draw conclusions now.
View OriginalReply0
GasWastervip
· 01-08 06:22
The red code correction set feels like another round of technical packaging; the key is whether there is actual application support. Walrus's recent strategy is good, but the Sui ecosystem is now a bit crowded; only a few projects will survive. RWA tokenization is getting tiresome; there are very few projects that are truly usable, so I'm just watching for now. Wanting both efficiency and low cost, this theory runs well on testnet but reveals its true colors on mainnet. Metadata on-chain sounds impressive, but isn't this just the old routine of infra projects? Tokenomics is the real life-or-death line. Does DeFi still lack infrastructure? Now everyone claims to be infrastructure, but I think it's all just stories. WAL's essential support is a bit虚; I don't really believe it until I see a killer app. Differentiation advantages in the storage track? I've heard this phrase too many times in crypto, and in the end, there's not much difference.
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalkervip
· 01-08 04:59
Storage has always been a pain point. Walrus's approach does seem a bit interesting. The RedStuff erasure coding scheme sounds impressive, but can the ecosystem applications keep up? That's the key. The WAL token design is quite reasonable, but what new story can a storage coin tell? It's true that the Sui ecosystem lacks storage infrastructure, but the Arweave ecosystem has been working on this for a while. Can the on-chain metadata solution really solve privacy issues? Or is it just another theoretical plan? A significant reduction in bandwidth consumption? I just want to know how it performs in real-world operation, not just on paper. DeFi-compatible storage is a good idea, but who will be the first to take the plunge? Everything looks good, but I'm worried it might just be another project with a "great concept but mediocre execution."
View OriginalReply0
LightningSentryvip
· 01-08 04:55
Now the Sui ecosystem has come up with a new trick, the storage protocol is seriously competing. Wait, can this Red Stuff erasure code really hold up, and can it really save that much bandwidth? The WAL token design looks good, but the real test is in ecological implementation. The storage race is now very competitive, can Walrus survive? Tsk, another infrastructure project; developers need to be willing to use it. This combo sounds great, but the actual effectiveness depends on the test data.
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmivip
· 01-08 04:51
The red code scheme sounds pretty impressive, but I’m not sure it can really eliminate centralized storage. WAL’s essential support is all talk; I’m just worried it’s another vapor project trying to scam a quick buck. How many times have we fallen into the trap of decentralized storage? It would be surprising if Walrus doesn’t crash this time. Metadata on-chain linked with contracts? Sounds very high-tech, but how practical is it? Is it just hype or truly feasible? The storage sector is the most money-burning; let’s see how much funding the project has raised before making any judgments.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractWorkervip
· 01-08 04:51
The Red Dot Erasure Code sounds high-end, but in reality, it's just about saving bandwidth costs, right? Old tricks again. How is WAL's value cycle designed? Could it be another story of a project that cuts and runs after making quick gains? With so many projects in the storage track, why will Walrus survive until the end? Will there really be ecological applications coming? The metadata on-chain part is somewhat interesting. Can it truly be tightly integrated with DeFi, or is it just another gimmick? Honestly, those who are optimistic about infrastructure are already making a lot of money, but will Walrus become the next forgotten project? Programmable storage sounds great, but the question is, will anyone really use it? Or is it just for the sake of using it?
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinArbitrageurvip
· 01-08 04:46
Red erasure codes sound complicated, but basically it's about reducing costs and increasing efficiency—something we've seen many times in Web3. Is WAL token's essential need plus economic cycle? Just listen, but the key still depends on real demand. When will Walrus have real applications? Talking about architecture alone is useless. There are many storage protocols, but how many are truly usable? Let's wait and see what comes next. It's both infrastructure and differentiation—why does it feel like every project says the same thing?
View OriginalReply0
SpeakWithHatOnvip
· 01-08 04:44
It's another storage track, and this time it's really something. Redstuff's erasure coding is indeed powerful; data repair only requires one slice... Forget it, my brain can't keep up, anyway it's not worse than centralized solutions. I agree with the urgent need for WAL, but without ecological applications catching up, it's still pointless... Whether Sui chain can truly have a killer app is the key. Wait, this smart contract combined with metadata on the chain... could it be another Arweave story? Sounds impressive, but how many real needs can actually be implemented... let's wait and see. RWA tokenization is quite interesting; it makes the story of pure storage more complete.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)