#密码资产动态追踪 Solana's process of financialization has really started to accelerate recently—immediately after the launch of spot and staking ETFs, a surge of trading volume emerged, with some mainstream products even recording several weeks of hundreds of millions of dollars in transactions and net inflows. This level of enthusiasm is indeed extraordinary.
The key question is: Is this volume driven by a short-term "novelty effect" or has a new capital channel truly formed?
Looking at it from several angles. First, ETFs are essentially the "main force" for traditional capital entering on-chain assets. Solana's ETFs are not just tracking SOL prices; they also come with "staking yield" packaging, which is particularly attractive to institutional funds seeking returns. This is a completely different approach compared to the previous purely hype-driven logic.
Secondly, the surge in trading volume also has a "new product effect" component—newly launched ETF products tend to attract concentrated trading and exploration in the early stages, similar to a "first-week hype." While the trading volume is large, volatility also follows, and whether this growth can be sustained long-term depends on the genuine willingness of institutions to allocate.
Interestingly, during the same period, ETF capital inflows into BTC and ETH remained relatively calm, while Solana's capital kept flowing in continuously. This indicates that the market is "overflowing" funds from large assets to seek other risk exposures.
From this perspective, the explosive volume of Solana ETFs may be due to the product's "initial attractiveness" and institutions testing the waters, or it could be building a more institutionalized capital inflow channel. Instead of just focusing on the trading volume numbers, it's better to understand the underlying "fundamental reallocation" logic—this is the core to interpreting market trends. $SOL
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MentalWealthHarvester
· 01-11 04:22
This time is truly different; institutional entry has made the staking yields quite impressive.
SOL's ability to break free from the shadow of BTC and ETH indicates that the market is really looking for new opportunities.
The new product effect definitely plays a role, but sustained net inflows are the real key.
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfer
· 01-09 21:18
To be honest, the current wave of SOL ETF enthusiasm seems a bit like the peak before a surf—momentum is indeed strong, but how many waves can truly be sustained?
The staking yield packaging really hits the pain point for institutions, but don’t forget, traditional finance folks fear volatility the most. Once LP yields don’t meet expectations, they’ll have to exit. Rebalancing capital structures is easier to talk about than to actually do.
View OriginalReply0
SighingCashier
· 01-08 05:00
Well, I really think this wave might not be a flash in the pan.
You have to admit that institutional funds have a keen sense; staking yields are indeed a new play.
From the calm reversal of BTC and ETH to the sharp surge of SOL, it feels like the market is looking for a new foothold.
But who can say for sure? Anyway, I will continue to observe institutional holdings data.
The worst-case scenario is a drop back after a few months; we've seen this kind of story too many times.
However, this time, the institutional framework of the ETF seems genuinely different; at least it's more reliable than pure hype.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityJester
· 01-08 04:59
Staking yield packaging indeed has a killing effect on institutions
Overflowing funds seek risk exposure, SOL is really bloodsucking
Can it hold up after the novelty wears off? That's the real point
BTC and ETH are too crowded, no wonder everyone is flowing into SOL
Short-term hype versus long-term channel, which one to bet on?
Institutional testing waters and real capital allocation are completely different
The question is how long this volume can be sustained
Rebalancing the fund structure makes the trading volume numbers much more reliable
Staking as a layer of protection sounds much more reasonable than pure speculation
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPrince
· 01-08 04:57
Institutional entry is like this: either explode or die, no middle ground.
View OriginalReply0
POAPlectionist
· 01-08 04:49
Sol this wave is really intense, but I'm more concerned about whether the institutions are truly allocating or just here to cut the leeks
Wait, neither BTC nor ETH are moving, and funds are just flowing into Sol? That must mean there's a serious lack of security
Staking yields sound attractive, but could it be another high-yield trap? Anyway, I don't really trust it
Once the new product hype subsides, it's all over; it wouldn't be surprising if trading volume halves
Ultimately, it still depends on how much real capital those big institutions are putting in; just looking at the numbers doesn't mean much
Sol is definitely attracting funds in this sector, but I've seen this "boom" many times before, and it all eventually fades away
Funds flowing out of BTC into Sol are either for thrill-seeking or because someone is pushing expectations higher—just watch
Institutional channels sound impressive, but the "institutionalization" in crypto is a joke; volatility remains just as high
This time is truly different, or just another bubble. We'll see in a couple of months—nothing can be said for sure now
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 01-08 04:42
Hey, the hype around SOL this time is really crazy. As soon as the staking yield is announced, institutions start frantically buying up.
Are institutions really "overflowing" with funds to find new risks? Or do I just feel like this is just the effect of a new product?
Wait, does this logic hold up... Maybe we should wait and see the data in two weeks first.
Can $SOL hold up this time? The key still depends on the genuine willingness of institutions to allocate.
#密码资产动态追踪 Solana's process of financialization has really started to accelerate recently—immediately after the launch of spot and staking ETFs, a surge of trading volume emerged, with some mainstream products even recording several weeks of hundreds of millions of dollars in transactions and net inflows. This level of enthusiasm is indeed extraordinary.
The key question is: Is this volume driven by a short-term "novelty effect" or has a new capital channel truly formed?
Looking at it from several angles. First, ETFs are essentially the "main force" for traditional capital entering on-chain assets. Solana's ETFs are not just tracking SOL prices; they also come with "staking yield" packaging, which is particularly attractive to institutional funds seeking returns. This is a completely different approach compared to the previous purely hype-driven logic.
Secondly, the surge in trading volume also has a "new product effect" component—newly launched ETF products tend to attract concentrated trading and exploration in the early stages, similar to a "first-week hype." While the trading volume is large, volatility also follows, and whether this growth can be sustained long-term depends on the genuine willingness of institutions to allocate.
Interestingly, during the same period, ETF capital inflows into BTC and ETH remained relatively calm, while Solana's capital kept flowing in continuously. This indicates that the market is "overflowing" funds from large assets to seek other risk exposures.
From this perspective, the explosive volume of Solana ETFs may be due to the product's "initial attractiveness" and institutions testing the waters, or it could be building a more institutionalized capital inflow channel. Instead of just focusing on the trading volume numbers, it's better to understand the underlying "fundamental reallocation" logic—this is the core to interpreting market trends. $SOL