2026-01-08 04:32:17

Zcash (ZEC) core developer Electric Coin Company (ECC) is facing a major upheaval. On January 8th, ECC CEO Josh Swihart publicly announced that the team has recently resigned collectively and plans to establish a new company. The root of this decision lies in a significant and ongoing divergence from the original project vision caused by its higher governance body, Bootstrap (a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization supporting Zcash).

What are the specific manifestations of the conflict? Over the past few weeks, the majority of Bootstrap's board members—including Zaki Manian, Christina Garman, Alan Fairless, and Michelle Lai of ZCAM—have been seriously misaligned with the core values of Zcash in decision-making. Josh pointed out that this disagreement has evolved into a substantive personnel conflict.

All ECC members resigned yesterday simultaneously, a situation described as a "de facto dismissal"—meaning that without directly firing employees, the terms of employment and working conditions were unilaterally changed, preventing the team from continuing to fulfill their duties while maintaining professionalism and technical integrity. In response to this situation, Josh emphasized that the ECC team will continue to develop Zcash under a new organizational framework, with the original team, maintaining the same technical standards and mission orientation.

ZEC-3,12%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

gas_guzzler

· 01-08 21:29

Zcash is back to internal conflicts again. Governance is really a big pit; the split led to the entire team leaving... Josh's move is also ruthless, directly leading the team to start a new company. It seems the bootstrap board really messed up. Now ZEC faces a real risk of split. Which side should the wallet choose? Why does it seem that privacy coin projects are particularly prone to power struggles... Bootstrap is completely self-destructive, forcing away the core development team and still trying to hold onto ZEC? Laughable. I heard Josh is preparing to raise new funds. I wonder if they can preserve ZEC's technical roadmap. It feels like ZEC might be under long-term pressure this time, confidence is damaged. This is the price of decentralized governance, each side has its own reasoning, nobody gives in.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiVeteran

· 01-08 04:58

Another old trick, governance team crash collection --- ZEC is going to cool down, the core team has all left --- Underhanded layoffs are getting complicated, luckily Josh dared to confront --- The wave of resignations is back, Web3 is just this cycle repeating --- Is the bootstrap board of directors messing up the direction? --- The original team remains independent, to put it nicely it's a split, to be harsh it's a product division --- NG L, this internal conflict has dealt a significant blow to ZEC's confidence --- Josh's recent actions can be considered as protecting the project's integrity, thumbs up --- It's always governance issues causing problems, it's really frustrating

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter

· 01-08 04:47

classic governance theater... they'll splinter, rebuild, then what? zec bags getting lighter by the hour ngl

Reply0

DaoDeveloper

· 01-08 04:46

tbh this is giving classic governance failure vibes... bootstrap board goes full mission drift while the builders actually maintaining the code are like "nope, we're out." the whole "constructive dismissal" angle is wild tho - basically forcing devs out without firing them? that's some next-level passive aggressive governance design lol

Reply0

TopBuyerBottomSeller

· 01-08 04:45

It's the same old story again—governance and developers clashing, and in the end, the developers all collectively withdraw... This is the cost of decentralization; no one can control anyone. Josh's move is ruthless—he directly causes everyone to resign and start anew. Bootstrap is too late to regret. Can ZEC hold up? It feels a bit risky.

View OriginalReply0

RugDocScientist

· 01-08 04:41

It's the old routine of power struggles in governance. The folks at Bootstrap just don't understand the true meaning of decentralization. Is ZEC doomed? Not really, Josh leading the team away actually makes it more authentic. This kind of disguised dismissal... It's really hard to change the traditional corporate mindset. Do privacy coins still have a future? Currently, they are under regulatory scrutiny. Let's wait and see if the new company can save ZEC. As long as the technical team is still there, there's hope. That's why I'm becoming increasingly pessimistic about governance tokens. The ECC team still has integrity; they would rather jump ship together than compromise. The few people at Bootstrap should reflect on their actions—they drove away the core developers. Those who follow Josh are true believers. The new company might actually be more daring. Is ZEC still worth paying attention to, everyone? Who will save my bag?

View OriginalReply0

TokenUnlocker

· 01-08 04:33

ZEC is causing trouble again... This time, are all team members leaving? Seems like there's more to the story. Josh's move is clever, preemptively gaining the upper hand in public opinion. Governance messed up again, Web3 is really all the same. Fork coming? Feels like it's only a matter of time. The core team has left, and the bootstrap board is left with just a few scraps. Still depends on how the new company's funding goes; without money to support the technology, it's all pointless. So what should current ZEC holders do...

View OriginalReply0