If you also care about data privacy issues, you may find that storage solutions on the market often waver between security and convenience. Walrus's Seal feature is different—it directly addresses this contradiction at the protocol layer.



The core is the encryption mechanism. Sensitive data is automatically encrypted upon upload, and you can finely control access permissions—who can view, and for how long—all executed by on-chain logic. This is not a black-box promise from centralized platforms, but a verifiable on-chain guarantee, eliminating the need to blindly trust any third party.

On the technical side, it’s also worth mentioning. Walrus uses erasure coding technology to store data, significantly reducing storage costs while maintaining competitive upload and retrieval speeds. As a key infrastructure in the Sui ecosystem, its performance design has been considered from the start for large-scale application scenarios.

From a tokenomics perspective, the circulation logic of $WAL is very clear. Staking to participate in network validation yields rewards, and storage fees are paid with tokens, creating real demand. More interestingly, as storage transaction volume within the ecosystem increases, the token will also have a deflationary effect, providing visible long-term value support.

The ecosystem projects are accelerating their integration, and community discussions are becoming increasingly in-depth. This stage is just the right time to experience the specific usage process.
WAL3,43%
SUI-0,35%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseMortgagevip
· 01-10 09:12
Walrus really has some substance; on-chain verifiability is much more reliable than the promises of those centralized platforms.
View OriginalReply0
SillyWhalevip
· 01-08 17:08
Erasure coding truly reduces costs, making it much more reliable than those projects that constantly boast about security.
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapyvip
· 01-08 10:14
On-chain verifiable is more trustworthy than any white paper promise; finally, there is a project daring to play this way.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFriesvip
· 01-08 05:51
Wow, I like the on-chain verifiability part. Finally, I don't have to trust middlemen anymore.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHomelessvip
· 01-08 05:49
Solving the contradiction between privacy and convenience at the protocol level is indeed a clear approach. On-chain verifiable solutions are definitely more reliable than black-box commitments, but the real test still depends on the actual user base. I want to understand more about the cost reduction through erasure coding. Can you compare it specifically with other schemes? The deflationary logic of $WAL sounds good, but the premise is that the ecosystem must truly come alive; just having digital figures on paper isn't very meaningful.
View OriginalReply0
rugged_againvip
· 01-08 05:48
Another hyped-up storage solution, let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidatorvip
· 01-08 05:42
The erasure coding scheme is good, but the key is whether the node stability can keep up with the growth of transaction storage volume. I'm actually interested in the staking reward model of $WAL. Do you have test data on the specific validator node yield? Protocol layer encryption is fundamental, but what truly determines reliability is whether the validation efficiency can hold up. The infrastructure construction of the Sui ecosystem is indeed accelerating, but the degree of decentralization needs time to be validated.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleInTrainingvip
· 01-08 05:41
Finally, someone has balanced privacy and usability. The previous solutions were really lacking.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt