2026-01-08 05:27:02

Actually, it's not just the first Chinese token, but more precisely, a token form named in languages other than English. If we classify by the language dimension of the token name, projects named in Chinese can be placed in the same discussion framework as English tokens like Bitcoin. Both are explorations that break the monopoly of a single language.

BTC0,13%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

25 Likes

Reward
25
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Rugman_Walking

· 4h ago

Breaking the English monopoly has long been overdue.

View OriginalReply0

token_therapist

· 6h ago

Oh, this angle is interesting. From a linguistic perspective, it has indeed become equal.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 6h ago

Haha, this logic is a bit convoluted... Chinese tokens are just Chinese tokens, why insist on saying breaking the monopoly?

View OriginalReply0

MEV_Whisperer

· 01-08 10:07

Bro, this logic is a bit convoluted. It feels like the concept has been expanded quite a bit.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTrooper

· 01-08 05:57

This logic makes sense; categorization based on language dimensions is indeed more interesting.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropAutomaton

· 01-08 05:45

I feel that this perspective is indeed innovative, but the classification based on language dimension might be a bit over-embellished.

View OriginalReply0

NightAirdropper

· 01-08 05:40

Breaking the monopoly of Chinese coins sounds great, but does anyone actually use it?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 01-08 05:37

Can Chinese tokens really be on the same level as Bitcoin? That's a bit of an exaggeration, haha.

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxOpener

· 01-08 05:35

Oh, now that you mention it, it does seem to make sense. I haven't considered the perspective of classification from the language dimension.

View OriginalReply0

ZKSherlock

· 01-08 05:29

actually... this framing's kind of misleading though? linguistic diversity in token naming doesn't really break anything fundamental about the cryptographic primitives underneath, right? whether you call it bitcoin or 比特币, the trust assumptions remain identical. feels more like semantic rebranding than actual structural innovation, ngl

Reply0