Over the past few years on BSC, I have developed my own set of gameplay rules. Instead of blindly chasing trends, it's better to set a strict standard—only focus on new tokens that can quickly break through a $10 million market cap. As for the rest, I’m too lazy to bother.
Honestly, this market is filled with many KOLs playing their own games. I also see information from official channels, but 99% of it is just for laughs. The truly worth paying attention to are those top figures casually posting—maybe explanations, maybe jokes—then the funds following suit can rapidly push up the market cap. If a token breaks through the $10 million mark in a short period, I’ll mark it down, wait for it to stabilize after a correction, and then look for a suitable entry point.
Why do I do this? Because behind tokens that can reach this height quickly, there are usually big players supporting the market. It’s not a coincidence; it’s the market’s rule. Those that can’t go up are mostly their own schemes, and I refuse to be the bagholder.
A few classic cases in history illustrate this well. The TST wave was the most classic—originally just an internal test token, and the official repeatedly said "this is not our project." Yet, the community got more and more excited, and the market cap soared to over 50 million, eventually even listing on mainstream exchanges, reaching nearly 500 million at its peak. Although it fell back to around 15 million, it was later pumped again.
Another example is the Middle East-themed wave in March 2025. The exchange just partnered with a Middle Eastern fund, and the official casually posted some Arabic-style design elements. The top figures reposted with "Mubarak" (congratulations), and the entire themed token took off. This is the pattern—sound + community consensus + big support, combined to create a market movement.
So my current strategy is simple: filter signals → observe the rapid rise → wait for a correction → enter precisely. Compared to guessing blindly, this approach greatly reduces the risk of getting caught in traps.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DeFiGrayling
· 01-10 02:46
Haha, this set of rules basically means waiting for big players to help lift you up.
View OriginalReply0
VirtualRichDream
· 01-09 23:25
This logic sounds reliable, but is the 10 million threshold really that accurate?
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-08 05:59
Exactly right, the 10 million mark is indeed a watershed; if you can't surpass it, you're basically just harvesting the chives.
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sipper
· 01-08 05:58
It sounds like they're talking about the big players manipulating the market. Is the number 10 million really that sacred?
View OriginalReply0
OneBlockAtATime
· 01-08 05:53
Haha, crossing the 10 million mark is quite a bold move; it's indeed a good way to filter out junk coins.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainGossiper
· 01-08 05:51
Hey, to be honest, it still depends on the big players' attitude. The 10 million mark is a watershed.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearcher
· 01-08 05:49
Wait a minute, using Token economics to backtrack this logic is actually full of flaws. Based on the data performance, the $10 million threshold is essentially a manually set technical indicator, with no economic foundation to support its effectiveness.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 01-08 05:38
I see through it. It's just waiting for big players' signals to follow. To put it nicely, it's "observing patterns."
Over the past few years on BSC, I have developed my own set of gameplay rules. Instead of blindly chasing trends, it's better to set a strict standard—only focus on new tokens that can quickly break through a $10 million market cap. As for the rest, I’m too lazy to bother.
Honestly, this market is filled with many KOLs playing their own games. I also see information from official channels, but 99% of it is just for laughs. The truly worth paying attention to are those top figures casually posting—maybe explanations, maybe jokes—then the funds following suit can rapidly push up the market cap. If a token breaks through the $10 million mark in a short period, I’ll mark it down, wait for it to stabilize after a correction, and then look for a suitable entry point.
Why do I do this? Because behind tokens that can reach this height quickly, there are usually big players supporting the market. It’s not a coincidence; it’s the market’s rule. Those that can’t go up are mostly their own schemes, and I refuse to be the bagholder.
A few classic cases in history illustrate this well. The TST wave was the most classic—originally just an internal test token, and the official repeatedly said "this is not our project." Yet, the community got more and more excited, and the market cap soared to over 50 million, eventually even listing on mainstream exchanges, reaching nearly 500 million at its peak. Although it fell back to around 15 million, it was later pumped again.
Another example is the Middle East-themed wave in March 2025. The exchange just partnered with a Middle Eastern fund, and the official casually posted some Arabic-style design elements. The top figures reposted with "Mubarak" (congratulations), and the entire themed token took off. This is the pattern—sound + community consensus + big support, combined to create a market movement.
So my current strategy is simple: filter signals → observe the rapid rise → wait for a correction → enter precisely. Compared to guessing blindly, this approach greatly reduces the risk of getting caught in traps.