Based on the current $BTC trend, it indeed reflects some characteristics of 2017—back then, veteran holders started to realize profits in a concentrated manner, but the influx of new funds was far from enough to balance the selling pressure.
From the market performance, early whale holdings are indeed more stubborn than expected. Their cost basis is basically zero, so even selling at current prices yields astronomical profits, making the selling pressure very persistent. In comparison, ETFs and institutions, while having enough capacity to absorb sell-offs, are clearly more cautious and restrained in their purchasing strategies, and would never blindly accept all sell orders.
From this perspective, the entire turnover cycle might take 6-12 months, or even longer, to complete. It’s somewhat like inventory clearance in real estate—having buyers alone isn’t enough; the key is whether the allocation pace of large capital can match the market, and whether retail investors’ sentiment can be rekindled.
This phase is less of a rebound and more of a slow bottom-building process. Time will tell.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SudoRm-RfWallet/
· 01-10 13:22
Whales dumping, institutions taking it easy, are retail investors just waiting around? This pace is really hard to keep up with.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaser
· 01-10 04:29
Whales are dumping, institutions are watching, and retail investors just have to wait... How long will we have to endure this?
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 01-09 17:32
ngl this whale dump thesis hits different when you actually think about the gas fees they're paying to move that btc... like zero cost basis but they're still bleeding on network congestion, no cap
Reply0
DiamondHands
· 01-08 05:57
6-12 months? Bro, are you trying to build my confidence or what?
---
Whale costs are basically zero. What are we retail investors catching? Feeling distressed.
---
Honestly, we just have to wait for institutions to gradually eat up. Let's just consider ourselves as supporting players.
---
This logic is clear, but I'm afraid by the time the turnover is complete, even the yellow flowers will have withered.
---
Another 6-12 months. At this rate, I should consider changing careers.
---
Bottom formation, just listen to it. If it were truly forming, it wouldn't be so difficult.
---
Institutions are cautious and restrained. Basically, they look down on our small sell-offs.
---
Missed the bottom in 2017. Should we continue this time? That's a bit frustrating.
---
Time will give the answer? I'm just worried the answer won't be what I want.
---
Whales with zero holding costs, what do we have to compare with them?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedDreams
· 01-08 05:54
Whale zero-cost selling pressure... To put it simply, it's about slowly enduring it. Institutions aren't fools and won't buy all the supply at once.
---
6 to 12 months? That must be so torturous. Can retail investors' emotions really be triggered?
---
Talking about bottom-building again. I've heard this for over a year. When the time comes to give the answer, why does it feel so heartbreaking?
---
The analogy of clearing inventory in real estate is quite fitting. Basically, just wait. There's no shortcut.
---
Early holders are lying back and counting money. Are we just waiting here? Feels a bit off.
---
Having zero holding cost is just ridiculous. It's like getting free growth for so many years, and now we're just slowly selling.
View OriginalReply0
HypotheticalLiquidator
· 01-08 05:53
6-12 months? I see it more pessimistically... The issue of whales dumping at zero cost is really just the prelude to a domino effect. The most heartbreaking part is that institutions are not stepping in to buy, and when liquidation prices drop all the way down, chain reactions of liquidations will happen in minutes.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainGossiper
· 01-08 05:49
Whale costs are zero, that's outrageous... We retail investors are taking on sky-high prices, and we have to wait for them to slowly offload.
Based on the current $BTC trend, it indeed reflects some characteristics of 2017—back then, veteran holders started to realize profits in a concentrated manner, but the influx of new funds was far from enough to balance the selling pressure.
From the market performance, early whale holdings are indeed more stubborn than expected. Their cost basis is basically zero, so even selling at current prices yields astronomical profits, making the selling pressure very persistent. In comparison, ETFs and institutions, while having enough capacity to absorb sell-offs, are clearly more cautious and restrained in their purchasing strategies, and would never blindly accept all sell orders.
From this perspective, the entire turnover cycle might take 6-12 months, or even longer, to complete. It’s somewhat like inventory clearance in real estate—having buyers alone isn’t enough; the key is whether the allocation pace of large capital can match the market, and whether retail investors’ sentiment can be rekindled.
This phase is less of a rebound and more of a slow bottom-building process. Time will tell.