2026-01-08 05:31:00

#MSCI未排除数字资产财库企业纳入范围 WLFI Officially Launches the Construction of the National Trust Bank

Latest news: WLFI's move has caused quite a stir in the digital asset field. What does the establishment of a national-level trust bank mean?

It is worth noting that MSCI's stance is also changing. From previously explicitly excluding digital asset treasury companies to now "not ruling out" their inclusion in the index system—this subtle shift in wording reflects a re-evaluation by traditional financial institutions regarding the compliance path of digital assets.

The combination of trust mechanisms and digital assets, exploring new asset management methods within a compliant framework, is a direction that the market should continue to watch.

WLFI9,28%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SleepTrader

· 01-11 03:32

Huh, MSCI's attitude has changed, now traditional finance can't sit still either --- National-level trust banks? Playing with digital assets under a compliance framework, this combo is quite interesting --- Wait, from "explicitly exclude" to "not exclude for now," that wording change is pretty subtle --- Trust + digital assets, it seems another round of discussion is about to start --- WLFI's move is probably paving the way for the industry, traditional finance is finally getting serious --- Honestly, it's still the smell of money that's too tempting; everyone can't avoid it --- The establishment of national-level trust banks is not that simple --- MSCI changing its stance, just change it, don't give me so many reasons, okay? --- Digital asset treasury companies are really about to be included in the index, unbelievable

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysQuestioning

· 01-11 01:50

Alright, has MSCI softened its stance? From exclusion to temporarily not excluding, this shift is interesting. Once the National Trust Bank is established, traditional finance is really embracing digital assets. Compliance + trust, it seems this is the right path, but whether it can truly be implemented still depends. WLFI's latest move is probably going to spark another discussion. By the way, is MSCI's change in wording genuinely optimistic or just following the trend out of necessity? This innovation within the compliance framework is finally somewhat interesting.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-09 13:06

Oops, MSCI's shift is happening a bit too quickly. They previously refused to acknowledge it, and now they say "not ruling out" it? Hmm, traditional finance is also starting to get uneasy. --- National-level trust banks + digital assets, this combination sounds different, with a sense of compliance. --- From "exclude" to "not exclude," basically admitting that this thing is going to happen. --- Really? MSCI's attitude changed so quickly? It feels like the entire traditional finance circle is re-evaluating us. --- Is the path of trust + digital assets the right one, or is it just another mirage? --- National-level trust banks are coming into play. This time, are they serious?

View OriginalReply0

SelfCustodyIssues

· 01-08 05:56

This shift is indeed interesting, but no matter how good the compliance talk sounds, it depends on implementation. I remain skeptical about MSCI's attitude change; the real test is still to come. Trusts and compliance frameworks sound great, but whether they can truly empower remains to be seen. The integration of digital assets and traditional finance sounds like a win-win, but the contest and struggle have just begun. We’ll have to wait for market reactions to see how WLFI’s move pans out. From ruling out to temporarily not ruling out, the political nuances in these details are worth pondering.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 01-08 05:54

Oh no, MSCI's attitude reversal is happening a bit too quickly. Wait, can we really make magic happen within the compliance framework? I'm a bit skeptical. Trust banks + digital assets, this combination sounds like walking a tightrope. WLFI's move is quite bold; we'll see how it is implemented later. Speaking of the index system inclusion, could it just be another round of hype? From excluding to temporarily not excluding, what does that imply? It shows that traditional finance can't sit still either. The establishment of a national-level trust bank—if it really happens, that will be significant. The road to compliance is long and winding; don't just talk about it on paper. Watching these changes, I still feel a bit of a distance.

View OriginalReply0

CafeMinor

· 01-08 05:51

Hmm... The MSCI shift is quite interesting. Has traditional finance finally woken up? Wait, a national-level trust bank? If this really materializes, it will be a big deal. We've been talking about compliance for so long; are we finally going to play for real? MSCI's wording game from explicitly excluding to not excluding for now is quite meticulous... Is this a signal? Traditional finance is about to enter the market. National endorsement + trust mechanism, it really feels like the trend has changed. Brothers, it seems like this time it's serious? Not just talk.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiAlchemist

· 01-08 05:46

*adjusts alchemical instruments* the transmutation thesis is real—when indices shift from explicit exclusion to "not ruling out," that's the philosopher's stone moment tbh. traditional finance finally admitting they can't ignore the yield dynamics anymore...

Reply0

RamenStacker

· 01-08 05:38

Oh, this is getting interesting. MSCI's attitude has shifted, and traditional finance is starting to look back. --- National Trust Bank? It might be another wave of policy dividends, but will it really be implemented this time? --- Changing from exclusion to "not ruling out for now," even this small change can be used as a talking point. Quite interesting. --- Compliance, compliance, always talking about compliance. When will the big moves actually come? --- Trust + digital assets sounds good, but I'm just worried it's another pie-in-the-sky promise. --- WLFI's hand is played quite well, at least making MSCI show some attitude change. --- Wait, so is it traditional financial institutions finding digital assets attractive, or just not wanting to fall behind? --- "A subtle shift," I think it's just the market forcing them to turn around.

View OriginalReply0

orphaned_block

· 01-08 05:34

What does this shift mean? Basically, traditional finance is starting to bow down. MSCI's attitude adjustment is quite interesting, from refusing to acknowledge to "not ruling it out for now," isn't that a slap in the face by reality? Compliance, after all, still comes down to hard currency. --- Trusts and national-level initiatives—this combination is quite sophisticated in its approach. --- It's hilarious. How they used to talk about digital assets, and now they're considering including them in the index system again. --- The key is whether this "national-level" initiative can truly be implemented; don't let it be another PPT-style fundraising. --- Honestly, the attitude shift of traditional financial giants is the best indicator of market sentiment. --- Innovating within a compliance framework? Sounds good, but who knows if it won't be restricted again in the end. --- WLFI played big this time, directly triggering the nerves of the entire market. --- Trust + digital assets—if this combo really takes off, it will be a whole different story. --- From "excluding" to "not ruling it out for now," the change in wording suggests that the market's rise and fall are all just dice rolls.

View OriginalReply0