Achieving fast block production depends on network stability — this is non-negotiable. The Fermi protocol has been upgraded in this regard, reconfiguring the rules for rapid finality voting. When on-chain block production speeds up, this new set of rules ensures that consensus is more stable and reliable. Simply put, as throughput increases, confirmation times are actually more secure.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SleepyArbCat
· 01-10 15:09
Another one talking about stability... Alright, can throughput and confirmation time be achieved simultaneously? Nap warning, I'll sleep first.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiChallenger
· 01-10 11:33
Interesting, another方案 that claims to find the perfect balance between TPS and security [smirk], data shows that the last project with such hype saw confirmation times increase by 3 times after half a year.
Ironically, every time they say it's stable and reliable, but what’s the reality? Objectively, this is just using new mechanisms to cover up old problems.
It is recommended to first provide actual test data, rather than just talking about rule adjustments. The lessons from history tell us that such claims are most likely to backfire.
I'm not trying to criticize, but anyone who has experienced the previous bubble cycles knows—higher throughput means higher risk, this is a physical law, not marketing.
Interestingly, no project has ever truly balanced these two metrics. So why does Fermi work?
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 01-10 05:44
Hey, this logic is a bit like the reverse operation of optimizing gas fees—achieving both throughput and stability? I'll believe it when I see on-chain data.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 01-08 06:52
Can stability and speed be achieved simultaneously? It depends on whether Fermi's mechanism can truly handle high concurrency. We'll only know after running a stress test.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBeggar
· 01-08 06:52
Can stability and speed be achieved at the same time? Fermi isn't bragging this time.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticLayer
· 01-08 06:51
Yes, that's right. Stability is indeed the baseline; otherwise, no matter how fast, it's all for nothing.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-1a2ed0b9
· 01-08 06:50
Can throughput and stability be achieved at the same time? That sounds a bit uncertain; it depends on how it performs in actual operation.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeGazer
· 01-08 06:36
This mechanism does seem a bit interesting, but I'm worried it might just look good on paper again.
View OriginalReply0
rugdoc.eth
· 01-08 06:34
Achieving both throughput and stability? Sounds ideal, but I'm worried it might just be all talk.
Achieving fast block production depends on network stability — this is non-negotiable. The Fermi protocol has been upgraded in this regard, reconfiguring the rules for rapid finality voting. When on-chain block production speeds up, this new set of rules ensures that consensus is more stable and reliable. Simply put, as throughput increases, confirmation times are actually more secure.