The changes in Web3 over the past two years have been quite obvious — it’s no longer just a retail playground for quick trades.
**Core Shifts in Infrastructure**
In the early days of Web3, everyone was just thinking about 'quick in and out' to make a quick buck. Now, it’s different. Institutions are beginning to realize that while speculation can bring quick profits, to participate in digital asset management long-term, they need to first build solid underlying infrastructure. This is not empty talk — from stablecoin settlement to cross-chain liquidity, from smart contract security to wallet usability, all these 'utilities' are becoming key competitive factors.
Looking at it from another perspective, it’s similar to traditional financial institutions entering the stock or forex markets, which require reliable trading and settlement systems. DeFi follows the same logic. When ecosystem infrastructure tokens like DOT, ATOM, and AVAX start gaining institutional attention, it fundamentally reflects this shift — big funds don’t want to build castles on the sand; they want solid assets that can withstand storms.
**Practical Issues Brought by Institutional Entry**
But this transition isn’t smooth sailing. If institutions really enter on a large scale, compliance costs will skyrocket. KYC checks, anti-money laundering procedures, regulatory communication — these are unavoidable. There’s also the issue of technological maturity. Many DeFi projects on the market are still in 'beta' stage, with significant room for improvement in stability and security.
And don’t forget, while institutional money is abundant, their withdrawal speed is also fast. Once market sentiment reverses, they can exit even more swiftly than retail investors — after all, they have professional teams and ample resources behind them.
**What Truly Deserves Attention**
At the end of the day, infrastructure is indeed the future direction. But this process will take a long time; we won’t see a 'building frenzy' overnight. Investors need patience and a calm assessment of the project’s technical strength and compliance capabilities.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StakeHouseDirector
· 01-11 06:18
Institutional entry sounds impressive, but isn't it still subject to regulatory approval? With such high compliance costs, there are probably only a few infrastructure projects that can truly survive.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 01-11 00:31
Isn't it ironic that institutional entry has become the biggest destabilizing factor?
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysAnon
· 01-08 06:54
Institutional entry sounds good, but who will bear the cost of compliance... In the end, it's still retail investors who take the blame
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmi
· 01-08 06:42
Compliance is really a stumbling block. Before institutional investors can enter, these review processes must be completed, which is very tedious.
To be honest, many DeFi projects are still at a beta level; it's too early to expect large funds to feel confident to come in.
This wave of DOT and ATOM has indeed been highly regarded, but with such a long cycle in the infrastructure track, only a few retail investors can hold out until the end.
Compliance costs have skyrocketed. How can small and medium projects survive? It's a bit risky.
Institutions run faster than anyone else; brother, don't get caught in it.
Infrastructure is indeed the direction, but who can endure such a long waiting period? It's easy to say.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 01-08 06:36
Institutional entry sounds quite grand, but frankly, it's just another new trick to harvest retail investors again.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMO
· 01-08 06:31
Sounds nice, but can institutional entry really be stable? I think their run-away speed might be even faster than ours.
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatcher
· 01-08 06:26
Institutions are entering the market sounding impressive and sophisticated, but essentially it's just another scheme to harvest retail investors' funds with a different disguise?
The changes in Web3 over the past two years have been quite obvious — it’s no longer just a retail playground for quick trades.
**Core Shifts in Infrastructure**
In the early days of Web3, everyone was just thinking about 'quick in and out' to make a quick buck. Now, it’s different. Institutions are beginning to realize that while speculation can bring quick profits, to participate in digital asset management long-term, they need to first build solid underlying infrastructure. This is not empty talk — from stablecoin settlement to cross-chain liquidity, from smart contract security to wallet usability, all these 'utilities' are becoming key competitive factors.
Looking at it from another perspective, it’s similar to traditional financial institutions entering the stock or forex markets, which require reliable trading and settlement systems. DeFi follows the same logic. When ecosystem infrastructure tokens like DOT, ATOM, and AVAX start gaining institutional attention, it fundamentally reflects this shift — big funds don’t want to build castles on the sand; they want solid assets that can withstand storms.
**Practical Issues Brought by Institutional Entry**
But this transition isn’t smooth sailing. If institutions really enter on a large scale, compliance costs will skyrocket. KYC checks, anti-money laundering procedures, regulatory communication — these are unavoidable. There’s also the issue of technological maturity. Many DeFi projects on the market are still in 'beta' stage, with significant room for improvement in stability and security.
And don’t forget, while institutional money is abundant, their withdrawal speed is also fast. Once market sentiment reverses, they can exit even more swiftly than retail investors — after all, they have professional teams and ample resources behind them.
**What Truly Deserves Attention**
At the end of the day, infrastructure is indeed the future direction. But this process will take a long time; we won’t see a 'building frenzy' overnight. Investors need patience and a calm assessment of the project’s technical strength and compliance capabilities.