Decentralized storage must truly achieve privacy control, and the key lies in the coordination of three layers of protection.
**From encryption to a complete decentralized chain**
Files are first encrypted end-to-end with AES-256 before uploading, so even if storage nodes are fully exposed, the actual data remains unreadable. Walrus's cleverness is that it doesn't just hand over ciphertext to a single node, but uses erasure coding and RedStuff 2D encoding to split the ciphertext into multiple shards, dispersing them across the network. A single node only receives a fragment, making it impossible to reconstruct the plaintext. This "encrypt then disperse" design completely prevents the possibility of restoring the original data—even if some nodes fail, the system can recover data from other nodes, ensuring redundancy and privacy simultaneously.
**Permissions are controlled by the chain, not by individuals**
All operations require signing with the Sui wallet private key, placing the responsibility of identity verification on the blockchain. Furthermore, you can set fine-grained authorization rules for Storage Resources via smart contracts—who can access which resource, what actions they can perform, and expiration times—all enforced by code. This avoids the common issue in traditional storage where permissions, once granted, cannot be precisely revoked.
**Real-world dilemmas of privacy and compliance**
Honestly, metadata such as Blob ID, file size, upload time, and access policies are usually public on the chain. If you're storing truly sensitive content, relying solely on Walrus's distributed storage isn't enough; end-to-end encryption combined with minimal disclosure principles is necessary. Additionally, the inherently immutable nature of decentralized storage conflicts with certain legal rights like the "right to be forgotten." Walrus offers renewal and deletion management capabilities, but achieving truly compliant deletion requires balancing application-layer controls with legal frameworks.
**Key points for getting started**
Use dedicated wallets to isolate risks and implement the principle of least privilege. Enable TLS encryption for data transmission and set request rate limits to prevent abuse. Turn on detailed logging for post-incident audits and anomaly detection. Regularly run walrus self-checks to verify configuration status. Most importantly, key management must be handled locally—encrypt data before upload and securely store keys—this is the foundation of the entire scheme.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TrustlessMaximalist
· 5h ago
Local key management is correct, otherwise everything is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 18h ago
Having the key stored locally is crucial; otherwise, it's all nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifier
· 01-08 16:51
metadata leakage is still the weak link here... Blob IDs publicly visible on-chain basically defeats half the privacy narrative, ngl. and that immutability vs right-to-be-forgotten contradiction? yeah, good luck squaring that circle with regulators.
Reply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 01-08 06:55
In simple terms, metadata is still exposed, and there's no way to avoid that.
Erasure coding sharding is indeed powerful, but self-managed keys are the real life-or-death line.
The Walrus scheme sounds great, but if it really goes to court for compliance issues, it could be a hassle.
Local encryption is fundamental, but most people simply can't do it properly.
On-chain permissions are much more reliable than traditional storage, I agree.
The conflict between the right to be forgotten and immutability... Web3's eternal pain point.
Red string 2D encoding sounds impressive, but how many hackers can it actually prevent? That's another story.
Key management done locally sounds easy to say, but for ordinary users, it's quite challenging.
TLS encryption for data transmission is basic; how can you use storage without it?
Three-layer protection sounds good, but real implementation still depends on individuals not to shoot themselves in the foot.
View OriginalReply0
StableGenius
· 01-08 06:51
ngl the metadata leak thing is the real red pill here... they're dancing around it like it doesn't matter lol
Reply0
DeFiCaffeinator
· 01-08 06:42
The logic of these three layers of protection is indeed perfect, but the metadata part is still a bit uncertain.
---
Walrus's erasure coding dispersal method is much better than traditional storage; finally, there's no need to rely on node integrity.
---
Managing keys locally is the right approach, but how many people can actually implement it in practice?
---
The issue of compliant deletion is truly painful; decentralization and the right to be forgotten are inherently conflicting, and there's no silver bullet.
---
Fine-grained control of smart contract permissions is much better than manual authorization; at least the code won't do things behind your back.
---
Basically, it's about shifting trust from people to the chain. It sounds great, but that's about it.
---
Will anyone seriously implement basic configurations like TLS rate limiting, or is it just another paper tiger?
---
I really like the idea of erasure coding sharding; it's truly excellent that a single node can't access the complete data.
View OriginalReply0
CodeZeroBasis
· 01-08 06:37
Wait, is the metadata still public? Doesn't that leave gaps in privacy...
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLab
· 01-08 06:37
Erasure coding, RedStuff, smart contract enforcement... In theory, they should be feasible, but metadata is still exposed on the chain, which is an art of mastering privacy.
It also locks you inside; local key management alone can deter half of the users.
Walrus's design is quite interesting, but its practical value is minimal.
View OriginalReply0
MonkeySeeMonkeyDo
· 01-08 06:36
It seems to be the same old story of decentralized storage in crypto, but Walrus's combination of AES-256 encryption and erasure coding is indeed powerful. A single node really can't see anything.
But to be honest, metadata is still exposed on the chain. If you want true privacy, you still need to rely on your own end-to-end encryption as a fallback. Walrus is just an infrastructure.
Local key management is the real focus; everything else is superficial.
View OriginalReply0
LootboxPhobia
· 01-08 06:31
In the end, it's still about managing your keys properly. No matter how fancy the architecture, it can't save a hands-off manager.
Decentralized storage must truly achieve privacy control, and the key lies in the coordination of three layers of protection.
**From encryption to a complete decentralized chain**
Files are first encrypted end-to-end with AES-256 before uploading, so even if storage nodes are fully exposed, the actual data remains unreadable. Walrus's cleverness is that it doesn't just hand over ciphertext to a single node, but uses erasure coding and RedStuff 2D encoding to split the ciphertext into multiple shards, dispersing them across the network. A single node only receives a fragment, making it impossible to reconstruct the plaintext. This "encrypt then disperse" design completely prevents the possibility of restoring the original data—even if some nodes fail, the system can recover data from other nodes, ensuring redundancy and privacy simultaneously.
**Permissions are controlled by the chain, not by individuals**
All operations require signing with the Sui wallet private key, placing the responsibility of identity verification on the blockchain. Furthermore, you can set fine-grained authorization rules for Storage Resources via smart contracts—who can access which resource, what actions they can perform, and expiration times—all enforced by code. This avoids the common issue in traditional storage where permissions, once granted, cannot be precisely revoked.
**Real-world dilemmas of privacy and compliance**
Honestly, metadata such as Blob ID, file size, upload time, and access policies are usually public on the chain. If you're storing truly sensitive content, relying solely on Walrus's distributed storage isn't enough; end-to-end encryption combined with minimal disclosure principles is necessary. Additionally, the inherently immutable nature of decentralized storage conflicts with certain legal rights like the "right to be forgotten." Walrus offers renewal and deletion management capabilities, but achieving truly compliant deletion requires balancing application-layer controls with legal frameworks.
**Key points for getting started**
Use dedicated wallets to isolate risks and implement the principle of least privilege. Enable TLS encryption for data transmission and set request rate limits to prevent abuse. Turn on detailed logging for post-incident audits and anomaly detection. Regularly run walrus self-checks to verify configuration status. Most importantly, key management must be handled locally—encrypt data before upload and securely store keys—this is the foundation of the entire scheme.