The Walrus project officially announced the complete economic model for the $WAL token, and this distribution plan is quite interesting. The total supply is 5 billion tokens, with 60% allocated to the community, which truly reflects the emphasis on community ecology.
Let's look at the specific allocation breakdown. Community reserves account for 43%, equivalent to 2.15 billion tokens, mainly used for ecosystem development, liquidity mining, and community incentives, with usage determined by community governance. User airdrops make up 10% (500 million tokens), rewarding early testnet participants and ecosystem contributors. Core contributors receive 30% of the share, about 1.5 billion tokens, linearly released over 4 years. Institutional investors are allocated 7% (350 million tokens), unlocked within 2 years. The remaining 10% is used for storage subsidies, directly offsetting users' storage costs.
In terms of unlocking schedule, core contributors undergo a 4-year linear unlock, releasing 1/16 of their share each quarter, ensuring long-term commitment from the team. Investors are also not fully unlocked at once; their tokens are released over 2 years, with 1/8 unlocked each quarter. Community reserves are quite flexible, with their use and timing entirely decided by the community. User airdrops are straightforward, distributed in one lump sum after mainnet launch. Storage subsidies are dynamically adjusted based on actual storage needs.
Regarding the token's functions, $WAL can be used to pay for storage fees, as users need to spend tokens when storing data, and staking the tokens can also earn rewards. This design tightly links token demand with ecosystem usage, making it relatively pragmatic. The community-led governance model also gives participants more say, and this kind of structure is still quite common in Web3 projects.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SmartContractDiver
· 01-08 06:57
Giving 60% to the community is quite reasonable, but it's still a bit painful that core contributors get only 30%.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 01-08 06:44
60% of the community's hand is played quite well, but I'm worried it will ultimately become a game where big players harvest the little guys.
View OriginalReply0
LootboxPhobia
· 01-08 06:38
60% community allocation, this number looks quite reasonable, but the key is how it will be used later, right?
Wait, the core contributors' 30% unlocks after four years? Everyone understands what that means.
The storage subsidy part is interesting, directly offsetting user costs, which really hits the pain point.
To put it simply, tying the token to real applications is much more reliable than pure speculation.
A one-time airdrop? Okay, at least it's transparent, unlike some projects that keep hidden mines every day.
View OriginalReply0
MetaLord420
· 01-08 06:35
60% to the community is actually pretty good; at least it doesn't seem like they're cutting the leeks so blatantly
---
Core contributors are releasing linearly over 4 years. Everyone's using this routine now; it all depends on whether they can hold up later
---
Directly subsidizing storage costs? That's an interesting approach—much better than just burning money
---
Community reserves at 43%... sounds nice, but in the end, it's still the investors who call the shots
---
Staking can earn yields, with a supply of 5 billion... could it be another inflation monster?
---
Airdrops right after mainnet launch? That's a bit rushed—are there really that many people waiting?
---
I agree with tying the use cases and ecosystem; unlike some projects' tokens that can't do anything
---
Unlocking institutional investor shares over 2 years; the first half will inevitably see a dump—don't ask me how I know
---
Community governance sounds great, but in reality, big players are still big players
The Walrus project officially announced the complete economic model for the $WAL token, and this distribution plan is quite interesting. The total supply is 5 billion tokens, with 60% allocated to the community, which truly reflects the emphasis on community ecology.
Let's look at the specific allocation breakdown. Community reserves account for 43%, equivalent to 2.15 billion tokens, mainly used for ecosystem development, liquidity mining, and community incentives, with usage determined by community governance. User airdrops make up 10% (500 million tokens), rewarding early testnet participants and ecosystem contributors. Core contributors receive 30% of the share, about 1.5 billion tokens, linearly released over 4 years. Institutional investors are allocated 7% (350 million tokens), unlocked within 2 years. The remaining 10% is used for storage subsidies, directly offsetting users' storage costs.
In terms of unlocking schedule, core contributors undergo a 4-year linear unlock, releasing 1/16 of their share each quarter, ensuring long-term commitment from the team. Investors are also not fully unlocked at once; their tokens are released over 2 years, with 1/8 unlocked each quarter. Community reserves are quite flexible, with their use and timing entirely decided by the community. User airdrops are straightforward, distributed in one lump sum after mainnet launch. Storage subsidies are dynamically adjusted based on actual storage needs.
Regarding the token's functions, $WAL can be used to pay for storage fees, as users need to spend tokens when storing data, and staking the tokens can also earn rewards. This design tightly links token demand with ecosystem usage, making it relatively pragmatic. The community-led governance model also gives participants more say, and this kind of structure is still quite common in Web3 projects.