Regarding the future prospects of $LIT listing, the current situation is relatively clear. The project has already been listed on a compliant platform, but it still has some distance from a top-tier exchange. From the data perspective, more than 50% of airdrop participants still choose to hold their tokens without selling, reflecting that the market consensus on the current price has not yet been reached.
From a fundamental standpoint, LIT's on-chain activity remains decent, comparable to similar projects like Aster. The next focus for listing should be on a top-tier Korean exchange or consider a second-tier platform. However, the review process for such exchanges is relatively lengthy—usually, it takes about two weeks after TGE before any substantial action is taken.
Overall, a first-tier Korean exchange would be the most ideal choice for LIT. From the perspectives of liquidity and ecosystem support, this would provide significant assistance to both the project team and the community.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ColdWalletGuardian
· 01-11 06:25
What else can I do if I can't pay? Just wait.
View OriginalReply0
NightAirdropper
· 01-10 11:04
Korean exchanges, huh... Just wait and see, anyway, it's been quite common in the past two weeks.
Holding 50% of the coins without selling is indeed interesting, indicating that everyone is still betting on the future market.
However, the activity level of LIT is only about the same as Aster. How should I put it... Maybe it can only truly take off after gaining support from major exchanges.
View OriginalReply0
RunWithRugs
· 01-08 15:50
I'm optimistic about that line of the Korean exchange, but the two-week waiting period is indeed a bit torturous.
View OriginalReply0
WealthCoffee
· 01-08 07:02
Korean exchange thing... waiting two weeks for any action? That's too slow, I thought it would be quicker.
The fact that 50% of holders are not selling is actually quite interesting, indicating that some people still have confidence.
Aster's project activity is about the same, and LIT isn't particularly outstanding either.
It really needs to be listed on top-tier exchanges for liquidity to explode. At this point, it's still a bit uncertain.
Heard that the review process takes so long, will the market enthusiasm be gone by then...
Second-tier platforms are fine, but the main thing is quick circulation to make it meaningful.
View OriginalReply0
ThreeHornBlasts
· 01-08 07:00
Korean exchanges waiting another two weeks? I think it's uncertain. This pace isn't much faster than Aster either.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSnapHunter
· 01-08 06:54
50% are still holding and not selling, indicating everyone has a sense of what's going on
Korean exchanges do have good liquidity, but the two-week waiting period is a bit frustrating
Aster's activity level is about the same, it seems LIT still needs to continue consolidating
This price consensus hasn't been reached, it feels like we need to wait a bit longer to see clearly
The leading exchanges are just one step away, feeling a bit anxious indeed
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 01-08 06:52
Korean exchanges... and two weeks? Feels like the same old story again, we'll have to see how the market reacts then.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperer
· 01-08 06:52
honestly the math doesn't check out here... 50% hodlers just means 50% are bag holding till the inevitable dump lol. korean exchanges sound nice on paper but we've seen this exact play before
Reply0
BuyTheTop
· 01-08 06:44
Does it really take two weeks for Korean exchange approval? Then I better stock up on snacks, this wait is so exhausting.
Regarding the future prospects of $LIT listing, the current situation is relatively clear. The project has already been listed on a compliant platform, but it still has some distance from a top-tier exchange. From the data perspective, more than 50% of airdrop participants still choose to hold their tokens without selling, reflecting that the market consensus on the current price has not yet been reached.
From a fundamental standpoint, LIT's on-chain activity remains decent, comparable to similar projects like Aster. The next focus for listing should be on a top-tier Korean exchange or consider a second-tier platform. However, the review process for such exchanges is relatively lengthy—usually, it takes about two weeks after TGE before any substantial action is taken.
Overall, a first-tier Korean exchange would be the most ideal choice for LIT. From the perspectives of liquidity and ecosystem support, this would provide significant assistance to both the project team and the community.