True decentralization is not just a slogan; the key is whether the community has real decision-making power. WAL, this governance token, truly gives voting rights to holders—new asset classes to be added? Community votes. How to adjust fees? The community decides. How to set staking periods? Vote again.
A highlight case from Q2 last year: the community successfully added art assets to the ecosystem through voting, expanding the platform's RWA types to six. This wasn’t a decision made arbitrarily by the operators; it was entirely driven by community demand. This is what real decentralized decision-making looks like.
To encourage more participation in governance, the ecosystem also set up a mechanism: each vote increases dividend weight by 0.5%. In this way, highly engaged holders can earn more—basically, using real money to incentivize community activity.
The most interesting part is their proposal sandbox tool, where users can drag and drop parameter modules to customize proposals, with the system showing real-time expected impacts on TVL and APY. Even ordinary users can quickly understand the consequences of a proposal, significantly lowering the barrier. Additionally, market sentiment data is incorporated; if the panic index exceeds a threshold, an emergency governance meeting is triggered immediately. This is very necessary during market volatility.
Currently, governance discussions under this label are very active, with over 50 ecosystem proposals in the implementation stage. For crypto users who truly value participation and voice, holding WAL is not just a financial investment but also like buying a pass to participate in ecosystem development. Whether this model can form a sustainable decentralized ecosystem remains to be seen.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugDocDetective
· 01-10 09:40
It looks well written, but I still have some doubts. Can voting participation really stay this high, or will it ultimately be the whales who call the shots again?
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 01-08 07:03
This thing sounds pretty good, but the key question is whether anyone is really voting seriously, or if the big players are secretly manipulating the market again.
However, that drag-and-drop tool is indeed somewhat interesting, definitely better than a bunch of parameter tables.
View OriginalReply0
RadioShackKnight
· 01-08 07:02
Hmm... the drag-and-drop parameters do have some substance, but are there really many people with voting rights?
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHigh
· 01-08 06:59
I watched the wave of voting on art RWA, and there are indeed some valuable ideas. However, out of 50 proposals executed, how many are truly useful?
View OriginalReply0
MemeCoinSavant
· 01-08 06:46
ngl the sandbox tool thing actually slaps... finally someone making governance not feel like decoding ancient hieroglyphics lol
True decentralization is not just a slogan; the key is whether the community has real decision-making power. WAL, this governance token, truly gives voting rights to holders—new asset classes to be added? Community votes. How to adjust fees? The community decides. How to set staking periods? Vote again.
A highlight case from Q2 last year: the community successfully added art assets to the ecosystem through voting, expanding the platform's RWA types to six. This wasn’t a decision made arbitrarily by the operators; it was entirely driven by community demand. This is what real decentralized decision-making looks like.
To encourage more participation in governance, the ecosystem also set up a mechanism: each vote increases dividend weight by 0.5%. In this way, highly engaged holders can earn more—basically, using real money to incentivize community activity.
The most interesting part is their proposal sandbox tool, where users can drag and drop parameter modules to customize proposals, with the system showing real-time expected impacts on TVL and APY. Even ordinary users can quickly understand the consequences of a proposal, significantly lowering the barrier. Additionally, market sentiment data is incorporated; if the panic index exceeds a threshold, an emergency governance meeting is triggered immediately. This is very necessary during market volatility.
Currently, governance discussions under this label are very active, with over 50 ecosystem proposals in the implementation stage. For crypto users who truly value participation and voice, holding WAL is not just a financial investment but also like buying a pass to participate in ecosystem development. Whether this model can form a sustainable decentralized ecosystem remains to be seen.